Laserfiche WebLink
l I <br /> Pearson Property Slope Stabilization NGA File No 945216 <br /> 1907 West Mukilteo Boulevard February 19,2016 <br /> Everett,Washington Page 9 " !• <br /> anchors such as helical anchors. We recommend that five percent of the anchors, but no less than two <br /> anchors, be treated as performance anchors and be tested to a minimum of 200 percent of the design <br /> loads. The soil creep characteristics would be evaluated during these tests. We recommend that the <br /> foundation embedment of the residence and utilities within the yard area be verified by the contractor and <br /> measurements made in the field at the time of tieback installation to ensure tiebacks do not encounter the <br /> existing residence, or underground utilities. <br /> No-Load Zone: The anchor portion of all tiebacks must be located a sufficient distance behind the wall <br /> face to develop resistance within a stable soil mass. We recommend the anchorage be obtained behind an <br /> assumed no-load zone. The no-load zone is defined by a line extending horizontally from the base of the <br /> wall back towards the residence a distance of five feet. The line should then extend up from the base <br /> elevation at an angle from the horizontal of 60 degrees. We expect that some undocumented fill may <br /> exist beyond the no-load zone. We therefore recommend that the bonded portion of the tiebacks, or the <br /> helical anchor helicies,be placed a minimum of 15 feet beyond the face of the wall. We recommend that <br /> we monitor soil conditions during anchor installation in order to evaluate adequate penetration into <br /> competent soils. <br /> Soil Design Values: The tiebacks will likely terminate in glacial soils below the walls. For use in design <br /> of the anchors, we estimate an allowable grout to soil adhesion of 1,500 pounds per square foot(psf) can <br /> be used for grouted anchors. Load carrying capacities on the order of 10 kips or more could be achieved <br /> using 8- to 10-inch diameter helical anchors installed successfully. We recommend that we review <br /> anchor design and proposed installation methods. We should also observe anchor installation and testing. <br /> Tieback Installation and Testing: The contractor should be responsible for using equipment suited for <br /> the site conditions. We do not recommend the use of open-hole methods for the purpose of installing the <br /> tiebacks due to the potential for soil caving. Secondary grouting to increase soil adhesion may be used; <br /> however, if secondary grouting is used, the anchors should be tested using the methods outlined for the <br /> performance testing. <br /> In the case of the helical anchors, the contractor should determine the torque values required to achieve <br /> the desired capacity. However, the anchors should advance a minimum of 20 feet from the face of the <br /> wall and two anchors be tested to confirm design capacities. <br /> Two anchors should be performance tested to 200 percent of the anchor design capacity. The <br /> performance test should consist of cyclic loading in increments of 25 percent of the design load, as <br /> NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES,INC. <br />