My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3130 BROADWAY 2021-12-20
>
Address Records
>
BROADWAY
>
3130
>
3130 BROADWAY 2021-12-20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/20/2021 3:02:35 PM
Creation date
12/16/2021 7:51:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
BROADWAY
Street Number
3130
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Description of Activity <br /> The City of Everett Permit Services performed a site visit for 3130 Broadway on 01/24/2019 from <br /> approximately 8 AM to 9 AM. The purpose of the site visit was to perform visual observations of the <br /> general condition of the building and of the condition of structural systems where exposed. <br /> Observations were generally performed from the outside,with limited observations of two first-floor <br /> spaces (i.e.,western-most unit, unit at midpoint of building). The second story was not accessible. <br /> Observations were also performed for the first-floor framing from the crawl space for the eastern one- <br /> third of the building;the remainder was not observed due to confined conditions. <br /> Observation Summary <br /> The general condition of the building was observed to be in a state of disrepair and deterioration. <br /> However,the observable portions of the primary structural system for the main building, including the <br /> post-and-beam gravity system in the crawl space,were observed to be in good condition. The building <br /> appears to have experienced relatively more vertical settlement for the east half of the building relative <br /> to the west half, but did not otherwise exhibit vertical or lateral instability. The observed portions of the <br /> knee brace system appeared in good condition,with braces intact and firmly connected to the gravity <br /> framing. Other conditions in the structural system were observed that: 1) do not provide a code- <br /> compliant structure based on current requirements, including a recognized lateral system;2) may <br /> benefit from additional investigation;3) may be improved or mitigate future issues by providing <br /> proactive retrofits; and 4)should be mitigated to prevent deterioration of the structure <br /> Conclusions <br /> Based on the observed condition of the building geometry as a whole,and the condition of the knee <br /> brace system,the building do not appear to be structural unsafe in its current condition. This <br /> assessment is based on the following code requirements: <br /> • IPMC Section 108.1.1:The structure does not appear unsafe as defined in this section. Aside <br /> from settlements and minor modifications to the gravity system,the system appears to be <br /> generally consistent with the likely original construction. The structure does not show signs that <br /> it is not performing as originally intended. <br /> • IPMC Section 108.1.5 Item 4:The gravity elements do not appear insufficient to carry the <br /> vertical loads on the structure. The vertical loading conditions on the structure have not <br /> changed from the originally-intended loads. <br /> • IPMC Section 108.1.5 Item 5:The building does not show signs of existing or imminent collapse. <br /> • IPMC Section 304.4:The gravity system appears capable of supporting dead and live loads. <br /> • IEBC Section 202:The building does not appear to meet the definition for a "dangerous" <br /> building. It is therefore not meet the definition of"unsafe"based on the gravity system. <br /> It is noted that while the building does not appear to qualify as unsafe based on the criteria of the IPMC, <br /> the building does lack a complete lateral system as defined in the current building code. The system <br /> provided likely lacks adequate capacity,and lacks positive connections between the posts and the <br /> 69( <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.