My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7710 E CASINO RD 2021-12-16
>
Address Records
>
E CASINO RD
>
7710
>
7710 E CASINO RD 2021-12-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2021 9:14:52 AM
Creation date
12/16/2021 9:14:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
E CASINO RD
Street Number
7710
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • <br /> b. Hallways should comply with IRC Section R311.6. Note that the hallway appears to only provide a <br /> maximum height at one side of 7 feet. This can be accepted. However, it is noted that Section <br /> 2/A1.00 and Attic Floor Plan 2/A.101 do not show the same ceiling height, and the door is not located <br /> the same relative location to this height. The minimum 7-foot clearance must be maintained. See <br /> other comments below that may impact this clearance. <br /> RE: Did change in A101 -2 Proposed Attic (eliminated wall in Attic area) <br /> c. Stair Section 3/A.102 specifies cable guards with a 4-inch spacing. Cables are not sufficiently rigid and <br /> can splay, and do not comply with this requirement. The cable spacing should be reduced. See Section <br /> R312.1.3. <br /> RE: Did change in A102 -3 STAIRCASE SECTION <br /> g. The project appears to show modification of the attic into habitable space; note that the Attic Floor <br /> Plan 2/A.101 appears to incorrectly state this level as"unfinished attic". Section 2/A.102 specifies R-28 <br /> insulation between the 2x6 rafters. The minimum insulation at these locations, including the sloped <br /> ceiling in Section 1/A.1-2, should be R-38; this insulation should be continuous through the center area <br /> of the roof. Note that the structural plans indicate the roof framing is 2x8 construction. The correct <br /> framing should be shown consistently, and the insulation revised as required. The framing depth <br /> should not impact the minimum head clearances as discussed in Architectural Comment 3(b). See also <br /> Structural Comment <br /> RE: Did change in A102 -2 Wall Section & submitted extra document <br /> Additional Comments: <br /> 4. The plans show construction of a new stairway in Section 3/A.102. The required 10-inch stair tread depth <br /> should be measured from nosing to nosing. The stairway and floor framing should be revised. This may <br /> impact the minimum egress clearances around the stairs, such as but not limited to the clearance at the <br /> Attic between the stair guard and the door. <br /> RE: Did change in A102 -3 STAIRCASE SECTION <br /> Corrections Structural <br /> 3. The structural drawings indicate existing 2x8 roof joists. However, the architectural drawings indicate 2x6 <br /> joists. The correct framing should be verified. The framing should be shown to comply with the <br /> prescriptive requirements of Table R802.5.1(3), or substantiated by analysis per Section R301.1.3. <br /> RE: Revised Structural Set is being provided by PE of file. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.