My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8525 EVERGREEN WAY BURGER KING 2021-12-16
>
Address Records
>
EVERGREEN WAY
>
8525
>
BURGER KING
>
8525 EVERGREEN WAY BURGER KING 2021-12-16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2021 10:43:40 AM
Creation date
12/16/2021 10:43:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
EVERGREEN WAY
Street Number
8525
Tenant Name
BURGER KING
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 • <br /> Kelsey Heyd <br /> From: Kelsey Heyd <br /> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2019 12:32 PM <br /> To: 'Dan' <br /> Subject: RE: BK- EVERETT,WA_G.pdf <br /> Hi Dan, <br /> Thank you for getting this to me so quickly and apologies for the apparent email issues when you tried to originally send <br /> it.After reviewing the revised site plan, I have some clarifying questions/corrections. I think these should be easy fixes <br /> and am assuming they're likely just a placement issue with the software used. <br /> All comments/corrections are based on Page 2, site plan, of the plan set: <br /> • There is a white rectangle identified in the landscape area. On prior plans for this project that rectangle was <br /> indicated as a placeholder for where the freestanding sign was likely to go.The new detail/call-out provided for <br /> the freestanding sign area still shows that rectangle but also has an aerial view of the proposed freestanding <br /> sign—please clarify/revise. <br /> • The aerial view of the freestanding sign shows it placed in the sidewalk area which is prohibited.The sign can't <br /> encroach upon the required sidewalk,even if the sidewalk extends beyond the right of way into the subject <br /> property. A landscape protective island is also required per EMC 19.36.050.A.3 and as noted on my prior <br /> correction memo. Please revise. <br /> • All setbacks should be measured to the edge of the sign, not just the base as appears to be shown for the <br /> interior setback.The 3'front setback requirement should be shown from the back of the sidewalk, not the <br /> property line. Please revise. <br /> • Note: The aerial view seems to indicate the sign as parallel to Evergreen Way which is permitted, though most <br /> freestanding signs are proposed perpendicular for higher vehicular visibility. I thought it was worth mentioning in <br /> case it was unintentionally identified this way on the plan. <br /> Please let me know if you have any questions regarding these corrections/comments and I'm happy to help. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Kelsey Heyd <br /> ElAssociate Planner I Community, Planning& Economic Development <br /> 425.257.7275 13200 Cedar Street 2nd Fl., Everett,WA 98201 <br /> EVERETT everettwa.gov I Facebook I Twitter <br /> Note:Emails and attachments sent to and from the City of Everett are public records and may be subject to disclosure pursuant to <br /> the Public Records Act. <br /> From: Dan<dangettemy@gmail.com> <br /> Sent: Wednesday,September 25, 2019 10:03 AM <br /> To: Kelsey Heyd <KHeyd@everettwa.gov> <br /> Subject: BK-EVERETT,WA_G.pdf <br /> Kelsey <br /> Here you go thanks <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.