Laserfiche WebLink
EVERETT <br /> WASHINGTON <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 7725 <br /> RESOLUTION accepting the Public Works Site Area Selection Study and <br /> supporting implementation of the study's recommendations. <br /> WHEREAS, <br /> A. The Everett City Council authorized the Mayor to enter into a professional <br /> services agreement with Makers Architecture and Urban Design LLP (Makers) on <br /> October 24, 2018 based on the results of the Request for Proposal #2018-057 <br /> issued on August 16, 2018. <br /> B. The purpose of entering into a professional services agreement was to seek third <br /> party assistance to help identify the best future location(s) for Public Works <br /> Department personnel and services; provide for the modernization of public <br /> works operations to best serve Everett residents in the long term; and leverage <br /> public investment to help catalyze city development and add public benefit. <br /> C. The work performed by Makers was entitled the "City of Everett Public Works <br /> Site Selection Study." <br /> D. The study began in January 2019 and was divided into three phases: Existing <br /> Conditions and Visioning (phase one), Alternatives Evaluation (phase two), and <br /> Phasing and Funding Analysis/Implementation Strategy (phase three). <br /> E. Prior studies have found that the current existing public works site is undersized, <br /> degraded, and with poorly configured buildings that have structural challenges. <br /> F. Prior studies have also found that renovating the existing public works site <br /> cannot be done on a cost-effective basis for the long term. <br /> G. The current public works site is within the Metro Everett planning area and is <br /> situated along the Pacific Avenue corridor, an area that is anticipated to have <br /> significant growth potential and also serves as a "gateway" between interstate 5, <br /> the future terminus of LINK light rail transit service and downtown Everett. <br /> H. The study sought to address City Council priorities which included evaluating the <br /> costs and benefits of co-locating versus splitting up operations into more than <br /> one "campus;" limiting the potential increase in utility rates to support the <br /> development of a new public works campus; ensuring that operational efficiency <br /> is improved; and evaluating costs from a life-cycle cost perspective. <br />