Laserfiche WebLink
BMP and Infeasibility description <br /> applicable lists Infeasibility criteria and rationale for each <br /> BMP not selected <br /> T5.15 The following criteria can be cited as reasons for infeasibility without <br /> Permeable further justification(though some require professional services to <br /> Pavement make the observation): <br /> (continued) ❑ Where the site cannot reasonably be designed to have: <br /> • Porous asphalt surface<5%slope <br /> • Pervious concrete surface<10°%o slope <br /> • Permeable interlocking concrete pavement surface<12% <br /> slope <br /> ■ Grid systems< 6-12%slope(check with manufacturer <br /> and local supplier to confirm maximum slope) <br /> ❑ Where the subgrade soils below a pollution-generating permeable <br /> pavement(e.g.,road or parking lot)do not meet the soil suitability <br /> criteria for providing treatment.See soil suitability criteria for <br /> treatment in the SWMMWW,Section V-5. Note:In these instances, <br /> a 6 inch sand filter layer meeting city specifications for treatment <br /> may be used to provide treatment. <br /> ❑ Where underlying soils are unsuitable for supporting traffic loads <br /> when saturated.Soils meeting a California Bearing Ratio of 5 <br /> percent are considered suitable for residential access roads. <br /> ❑ Where replacing existing impervious surfaces unless the existing <br /> surface is a non-pollution generating surface over an outwash soil <br /> with a saturated hydraulic conductivity of 4 inches per hour or <br /> greater. <br /> ❑ Where appropriate field testing indicates soils have a measured <br /> (a.k.a.,initial)subgrade soil saturated hydraulic conductivity less <br /> than 0.3 inches per hour.Only small-scale PIT or large-scale PIT <br /> methods in accordance with SWMMWW Section V-5.4 shall be <br /> used to evaluate infeasibility of permeable pavement areas. (Note: <br /> In these instances,unless other infeasibility restrictions apply, <br /> roads and parking lots may be built with an underdrain,preferably <br /> elevated within the base course,if flow control benefits are <br /> desired.) <br /> ❑ Roads that receive more than very low traffic volumes,and areas <br /> having more than very low truck traffic. Roads with a projected <br /> average daily traffic volume of 400 vehicles or less are very low <br /> volume roads(AASHTO 2001)(U.S. Department of Transportation, <br /> 2013).Areas with very low truck traffic volumes are roads and <br /> other areas not subject to through truck traffic but may receive up <br /> to weekly use by utility trucks(e.g.,garbage,recycling),daily <br /> school bus use,and multiple daily use by pick-up trucks, <br /> mail/parcel delivery trucks,and maintenance vehicles. (Note:This <br /> infeasibility criterion does not extend to sidewalks and other non- <br /> traffic bearing surfaces associated with the collector or arterial). <br /> City of Everett Public Works <br /> Small Project Stormwater Site Plan Report-Dec 2019 32 <br />