My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5001 SOUND AVE 2022-05-13
>
Address Records
>
SOUND AVE
>
5001
>
5001 SOUND AVE 2022-05-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2022 10:59:56 AM
Creation date
12/23/2021 8:07:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
SOUND AVE
Street Number
5001
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
96
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BMP and Infeasibility description <br /> applicable lists Infeasibility criteria and rationale for each <br /> BMP not selected <br /> T5.15 The following criteria can be cited as reasons for infeasibility without <br /> Permeable further justification(though some require professional services to <br /> Pavement make the observation): <br /> (continued) E At sites defined as"high-use sites"(refer to the Glossary in the <br /> SWMMWW Volume I). <br /> ❑ In areas with"industrial activity"as identified in 40 CFR <br /> 122.26(b)(14). <br /> ❑ Where the risk of concentrated pollutant spills is more likely such <br /> as gas stations,truck stops,and industrial chemical storage sites. <br /> ❑ Where routine,heavy applications of sand occur in frequent snow <br /> zones to maintain traction during weeks of snow and ice <br /> accumulation. <br /> ❑ Where the seasonal high groundwater or an underlying <br /> impermeable/low permeable layer would create saturated <br /> conditions within 1 foot of the bottom of the lowest gravel base <br /> course. <br /> T5.14A Note:Criteria with setback distances are as measured from the bottom <br /> Bioretention edge of the bioretention soil mix. <br /> or Rain Gardens <br /> Citation of any of the following infeasibility criteria must be based on <br /> an evaluation of site-specific conditions and a written <br /> recommendation from an appropriate licensed professional(e.g., <br /> engineer,geologist,hydrogeologist): <br /> ❑ Where professional geotechnical evaluation recommends <br /> infiltration not be used due to reasonable concerns about erosion, <br /> slope failure,or down-gradient flooding. <br /> E Within an area whose ground water drains into an erosion hazard, <br /> or landslide hazard area. <br /> ❑ Where the only area available for siting would threaten the safety <br /> or reliability of pre-existing underground utilities,pre-existing <br /> underground storage tanks,pre-existing structures,or pre-existing <br /> road or parking lot surfaces. <br /> E Where the only area available for siting does not allow for a safe <br /> overflow pathway to stormwater drainage system or private storm <br /> sewer system. <br /> ❑ Where there is a lack of usable space for bioretention areas at <br /> redevelopment sites,or where there is insufficient space within the <br /> existing public right-of-way on public road projects. <br /> ❑ Where infiltrating water would threaten existing below grade <br /> basements. <br /> ❑ Where infiltrating water would threaten shoreline structures such <br /> as bulkheads. <br /> City of Everett Public Works <br /> Small Project Stormwater Site Plan Report-Dec 2019 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.