Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Courtney Crosby <br /> Plan Check Number: B2004-017, Second Structural Review <br /> August 5, 2020 <br /> Original Comment: The construction drawings do not include material requirements for the <br /> structural systems. Material properties, connection requirements, fabrication and coating <br /> requirements, and other information required to perform the structural work should be specified <br /> in accordance with the following design standards: <br /> a. Concrete: IBC Sections 1901.5. <br /> b. Steel: IBC Section 2205.1, AISC 360-10 Section A4, and AISC 303-10 Section 3.1. <br /> c. Wood: IBC Section 2306.1 or 2307.1, and NDS-15 and AWC SDPWS-15. <br /> 5. This comment generally appears to be addressed. However, it has been retained as it is <br /> anticipated that additional proprietary hardware may be required in the project. <br /> Original Comment: The project appears to include proprietary hardware (e.g., framing <br /> connections, post-installed anchors, etc.). The construction drawings should specify the make <br /> and model for each type of proprietary component in the project. Fastening requirements (e.g., <br /> nail sizes and count, etc.) shall be specified for each component where applicable. See IBC <br /> Sections 107.2.1 and 1604.1. <br /> 6. This comment has not been addressed. The revised documents provide revised plans and <br /> details. However, the submitted drawings are not construction-level documents. The following <br /> provides a list of observed issues. This is not intended to be a comprehensive list of <br /> deficiencies. The drawings should be thoroughly reviewed and revised to address the original <br /> comment. This list does not require an itemized response. <br /> a. Uncoordinated documents produced by two separate designers. The applicant is required to <br /> assemble these documents into a clear set of drawings. The drawings should be provided <br /> on a single sheet size. This is not a requirement of the permit, and we are not going to <br /> redraw these plans. These construction plans are to scale, and outline everything required <br /> for our permit. <br /> b. The "Plan View" on Drawing A appears to be the existing framing, but does not state this. <br /> The letter I sent you, dated June 5th, 2020, in the opening section, specifically provided you <br /> with a glossary of which drawing was which and they were also titled on each page. <br /> Excerpt from that letter on the construction documents, which are clearly labeled: <br /> i. Exhibits as follows: <br /> 1. Drawing A— Existing Carport Detail <br /> 2. Drawing B—Guard Post and Blocking Location Plan View and Steel Channels <br /> 3. Drawing C—Guard Post Detail <br /> 4. Drawing D—Post Detail and Eastside Guard Post Detail <br /> 5. Drawing E—Guard Detail <br /> c. The structure appears to have built-up framing. The construction of the framing, including <br /> connections, should be specified. See Drawing A, this was already specified in the previous <br /> drawing. <br /> d. The double 2x12 beam along the east side of the structure does not appear in photography <br /> of the structure. It appears you did not see the arrows on our drawing. There is no 2x12 <br /> on the East Side. They are only on the North and South Side running East-West, so we <br /> drew clearer arrows. <br /> ` 3200 Cedar Street �"\ 425.257.8810 ,� everetteps@everettwa.gov <br /> ,C� �. g /p <br /> \-L j Everett, WA 98201 '` -) 425.257.8857 fax everettwa. ov ermits <br /> Page30� f� <br />