Laserfiche WebLink
Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation NGA File No. 961916 <br /> Mason Residence Addition and Deck August 24,2016 <br /> Everett,Washington Page 9 f'25 <br /> areas should be planted as soon as practical and the vegetation should be maintained until it is established. <br /> The erosion potential for areas not stripped of vegetation should be low. <br /> Protection of the setback and steep slope areas should be performed as required by the City of Everett. <br /> Specifically, we recommend that the setback area and top of slope not be disturbed or modified through <br /> placement of any fill or removal of the existing vegetation. No additional material of any kind should be <br /> placed on either slope or be allowed to reach the slope, such as excavation spoils, lawn clippings, and <br /> other yard waste, trash, and soil stockpiles. Vegetation should not be removed from the slope. <br /> Replacement of vegetation should be performed in accordance with City of Everett code. Any proposed <br /> development within the slope setback area, other than light decks or patios, should be the subject of a <br /> specific geotechnical evaluation. Under no circumstances should water be allowed to concentrate on the <br /> slope. <br /> Structure Setbacks <br /> Uncertainties related to building along steep slopes are typically addressed by the use of building <br /> setbacks. The purpose of the setback is to establish a"buffer zone" between the structure and the top of <br /> the slope so that ample room is allowed for normal slope recession during a reasonable life span of the <br /> structure. In a general sense, the greater the setback distance, the lower the risk of slope failures <br /> impacting the structure. From a geological standpoint, the setback dimension is based on the slope's <br /> physical characteristics, such as slope height, surface angle, material composition, and hydrology. Other <br /> factors such as historical slope activity, rate of regression, and the type and desired life span of the <br /> development are important considerations as well. <br /> The proposed residence basement addition is planned to be as close as approximately 25 to 30 feet from <br /> the top of the existing steep northeast-facing ravine slope. The proposed deck expansion is planned to be <br /> as close as 10 to 15 feet from the top of the steep northeast-facing ravine slope. We recommend that the <br /> proposed addition foundations and deck foundations within the lower portion of the deck area along the <br /> top of the steep slope be supported on 4-inch driven steel pin piles extending through the upper <br /> undocumented fills and be embedded into the competent native glacial soils at depth. We anticipate that <br /> the pin piles will extend a minimum of 15 to 20 feet below the existing ground surface within the vicinity <br /> of the proposed addition and deck expansion. It is our opinion that the proposed addition and deck <br /> foundation setback along with supporting the basement addition and deck foundations closest to the top of <br /> slope on 4-inch driven pin piles embedded into the competent native soils should be adequate for this <br /> project. The proposed setback and deep foundation elements should limit the impacts of the proposed <br /> NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />