My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WA ST Dept of Ecology 2/15/2022
>
Contracts
>
Agreement
>
Interlocal Agreements
>
WA ST Dept of Ecology 2/15/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2024 7:10:18 AM
Creation date
3/4/2022 11:16:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Contractor's Name
WA ST Dept of Ecology
Approval Date
2/15/2022
End Date
12/31/2026
Department
Public Works
Department Project Manager
John Rabenow
Subject / Project Title
Nutrient General Program Discharge Permit
Tracking Number
0003215
Total Compensation
$0.00
Contract Type
Agreement
Contract Subtype
Interlocal Agreements
Retention Period
6 Years Then Destroy
Imported from EPIC
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. The analysis must be sufficiently complete that an engineering report may be <br /> developed for the preferred AKART alternative as well as the preferred <br /> alternatives to reach 3 mg/L TIN seasonally, without substantial alterations of <br /> concept or basic considerations. The final report must contain appropriate <br /> requirements as described in the following guidance (or most recent version): <br /> a. The Criteria for Sewage Works Design (ECY Publication No. 98-37, 2019)3 <br /> b. Reclaimed Water Facilities Manual:The Purple Book (ECY Publication No. 15- <br /> 10-024, 2019)4 <br /> 5. The analysis conducted for the NRE must include the following elements: <br /> a. Wastewater Characterization <br /> i. Current flowrates and growth trends within the sewer service area. <br /> ii. Current influent and effluent quality. <br /> b. Treatment Technology Analysis <br /> i. Description of current treatment processes, including any modifications <br /> made for optimization or due to corrective actions. <br /> ii. Description of site limitations, constraints, or other treatment <br /> implementation challenges that exist. <br /> iii. Identification and screening of potential treatment technologies for <br /> meeting two different levels of treatment: <br /> 1. AKART for nitrogen removal (annual basis), and <br /> 2. 3 mg/L TIN (or equivalent load), as a seasonal average April - <br /> October <br /> c. Economic Evaluation <br /> i. Develop capital, operation and maintenance costs and 20 year net <br /> present value using the real discount rate in the most current Appendix C <br /> to Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-945 for each <br /> technology alternative evaluated. <br /> ii. Provide cost per pound of nitrogen removed. <br /> iii. Provide details on basis for current wastewater utility rate structure, <br /> including: <br /> 1. How utilities allocate and recover costs from customers. <br /> 3 https://apps.ecology.wa.gov/publications/summarypages/9837.html <br /> 4 https://apps.ecology.wa.gov/publications/SummaryPages/1510024.html <br /> 5 https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/2020_Appendix-C.pdf <br /> Puget Sound Nutrient General Permit Page 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.