Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />car garage can be rebuilt on the same footprint and can be <br />certified as an existing non -conforming building. The new <br />garage will be constructed in the same location as the <br />'3 <br />H <br />existing garage. <br />C <br />Criterion No. 2: That the variance will not be materially <br />K 0 <br />detrimental to the property in the area of the subject property <br />O'[1 H0 <br />or to the city as a whole. <br />Ht�7 <br />a. Findings: No written adverse comments have been received <br />at this time. The applicant has stated that the variance <br />C <br />will not be detrimental because it will be a standard two <br />CI <br />g <br />car garage within all boundaries and will not restrict any <br />W4 O <br />view nor be an eyesore. { <br />H <br />b. elusions: The variance should not be materially <br />H <br />detrimental to the property in the area of the subject <br />property or to the city as a whole. <br />Fi <br />w <br />criterion No. 3: That the variance will only grant the subject <br />OCA <br />property the same general rights enjoyed by other property in the <br />- <br />same area and zone as the subject property. <br />a. Findings: The applicant has stated that the variance will <br />only grant him an opportunity to park his cars inside as <br />and to work on them indoors when the weather is adverse, <br />and that this is no more than what most other properties <br />have in the neighborhood. <br />��► <br />b. Conclusions: The surrounding properties are developed with <br />residential uses, the majority of which have garages. Two <br />garages in the area are very large and exceed the code <br />allowance for accessory structures. The granting of the <br />variance would permit the subject property the same rights ! <br />enjoyed by other properties in the area. <br />i <br />Criterion No. 4: That the variance is the minimum necessary to <br />allow the subject property the general rights described in <br />1 A J <br />Criterion 3. <br />a. EindL=: See Criteria /3. <br />b. CSoncluaions: See Criteria ,i3. <br />Criterion No. 5: The granting of the variance is not inconsistent <br />with the goals and policies of the Everett General Plan. <br />a. Findings.: The Everett General Plan designates this <br />property as Single Family Detached. The applicant has <br />stated that the variance request is not inconsistent with <br />the Everett General Plan as he is only requesting to <br />replace a one car garage with a two car garage that is <br />consistent with the area. <br />