Laserfiche WebLink
M Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation NGA File No. 1085419 <br /> View Ridge Estates 330 Building Settlement March 22,2019 <br /> Everett,Washington Page 6 <br /> are further discussed in the Foundation Underpinning Improvements and Slab-on-Grade Repairs <br /> subsection of this report. We should review underpinning plans prior to implementation. <br /> It is likely that portions of the structure not currently showing signs of distress may also underlain by the <br /> loose fill material encountered in our explorations. Under this scenario, underpinning only the currently <br /> distressed portions of the structure and slabs may create a situation where the remaining portions of the <br /> structure may start to settle after the distressed portions are underpinned. We recommend that after the <br /> recommended underpinning is completed, the structure be monitored for any signs of further distress, and <br /> additional pin piles or anchors installed if signs of further distress are observed. <br /> In addition to the foundation improvements, we recommend that the drainage system surrounding the <br /> building be investigated and improved, as necessary. Such improvements should include confirming the <br /> placement of footing drains around the building and routing all downspouts and runoff from all hard <br /> surfaces into a permanent discharge system. This is further discussed in the Drainage Improvements <br /> subsection of this report. <br /> Erosion Control Measures <br /> The erosion hazard for the on-site soils is interpreted to be slight, but actual erosion potential will be <br /> dependent on how the site is graded and how water is allowed to concentrate. Best Management Practices <br /> (BMPs) should be used to control erosion. Areas disturbed during construction should be protected from <br /> erosion. Erosion control measures may include diverting surface water away from the stripped areas and <br /> erecting silt fences to prevent muddy water from leaving the site. We also recommend that any soil <br /> stockpiles and excavation walls be covered with plastic sheeting and not placed near the steep slope. The <br /> erosion potential of areas not disturbed should be low. <br /> Temporary Slopes <br /> Some excavations may be needed to reach final pier locations. Temporary cut slope stability is a function <br /> of many factors, including the type and consistency of soils, depth of the cut, surcharge loads adjacent to <br /> the excavation, length of time a cut remains open, and the presence of surface water or groundwater. It is <br /> exceedingly difficult under these variable conditions to estimate a stable, temporary, cut slope angle. <br /> Therefore, it should be the responsibility of the contractor to maintain safe slope configurations since they <br /> are continuously at the job site, able to observe the soil and groundwater conditions encountered, and able <br /> to monitor the nature and condition of the cut slopes. <br /> The following information is provided solely for the benefit of the owner and other design consultants and <br /> should not be construed to imply that Nelson Geotechnical Associates, Inc. assumes responsibility for job <br /> site safety. Job site safety is the sole responsibility of the project contractor. <br /> (71 0:1 <br /> NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />