My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
McClure & Sons Inc. 4/18/2022
>
Contracts
>
Capital Contract
>
McClure & Sons Inc. 4/18/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/21/2024 9:17:31 AM
Creation date
4/22/2022 10:59:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Contracts
Contractor's Name
McClure & Sons Inc.
Approval Date
4/18/2022
Council Approval Date
3/30/2022
Department
Public Works
Department Project Manager
Ryan Sass
Subject / Project Title
Evergreen Pump Station Modifications
Public Works WO Number
UP3747
Tracking Number
0003303
Total Compensation
$4,863,152.90
Contract Type
Capital Contract
Retention Period
10 Years Then Transfer to State Archivist
Document Relationships
McClure & Sons Inc. 7/5/2022 Change Order 1
(Contract)
Path:
\Documents\City Clerk\Contracts\Capital Contract
McClure & Sons Inc. 7/5/2022 Change Order 2
(Contract)
Path:
\Documents\City Clerk\Contracts\Capital Contract
McClure and Sons, Inc. 11/21/2024 Change Order 3
(Contract)
Path:
\Documents\City Clerk\Contracts\Capital Contract\Capital Construction Contracts and Change Orders
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
900
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> Geotechnical Engineering Report Addendum 1 <br /> Micropile Foundations— Evergreen Way Pump Station In Everett, Washington lierracon <br /> August 2, 2021 ■ Terracon Project No. 81195189 <br /> should occur following completion of all micropile installation and testing activities have been completed. <br /> The contractor should observe the existing pump station building for signs of distress during installation <br /> and testing of micropiles. If distress is observed, the contractor should take action to stabilize the existing <br /> building, then evaluate the situation to determine corrective action. <br /> One field verification tension test should be performed on a test micropile prior to installation of production <br /> piles. The location of the verification test pile should be selected by the contractor and approved by the I <br /> City of Everett.Verification maximum test load should be 2 times the design load (allowable stress design) <br /> or the nominal capacity of the pile (LRFD design). The verification test micropile may be incorporated into <br /> the work as a production pile following completion of testing with satisfactory results. If soil conditions or I <br /> means and methods of installation vary, additional verification tests will be required. <br /> The verification test schedule should be incorporated into the Plans and Specifications for the project. I <br /> The micropile load testing procedures should be in general conformance with the procedures outlined in <br /> Chapter 7 Publication No. FHWA NHI-05-039 published by the U.S. Department of Transportation <br /> Federal Highway Administration. The ground anchor testing and stressing provisions and acceptance <br /> criteria found in 6-17.3(8) and 6-17.8(9), respectively, of the Washington State Department of <br /> Transportation (WSDOT) Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge, and Municipal Construction are <br /> generally applicable to testing of ground anchors. The following list notes key exceptions: <br /> e It is not necessary to test each micropile. We recommend the minimum number of tests above. <br /> ✓ Verification tests as described in the WSDOT Standard Specifications and Special Provisions <br /> should not be required. Performance Testing per the WSDOT Standard Specifications is <br /> consistent with verification testing as described in FHWA NHI-05-039 and this report. <br /> a The WSDOT Standard Specifications are prepared for LRFD design. The fractions of the full <br /> design load in the tables should be doubled for ASD. <br /> • Micropiles do not usually have an unbonded length as part of their design. Minimum elongation I <br /> requirements of the unbonded length should only apply if the micropile is designed with an <br /> unbonded zone. <br /> E Micropiles are not post tensioned elements. Discussion of lock off load should be ignored. <br /> Typically, 5-percent of production micropiles are proof tested. Based on the limited number of micropiles <br /> we recommend that one proof load test be required along each wall where micropiles are installed. If a <br /> verification test with acceptable test results is incorporated into the production piles, a proof test need not <br /> be performed along the wall with the verification test micropile. I <br /> Micropile load testing should be completed using a load frame capable of distributing large test loads into <br /> the near-surface soils without damaging existing structural elements or below-ground utilities. The large <br /> test loads frequently cause damage to slabs-on-grade and other nearby improvements, and the location <br /> of pile load tests should be reviewed during the design phase to minimize impacts to existing <br /> improvements. I <br /> I <br /> Responsive■ Resourceful at Reliable 3 <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.