Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> • <br /> Exhibit I <br /> Alleged Consultant Design Error Procedures <br /> The purpose of this exhibit is to establish a procedure to determine if a consultant has alleged design error is of a <br /> nature that exceeds the accepted standard of care. In addition, it will establish a uniform method for the <br /> resolution and/or cost recovery procedures in those instances where the agency believes it has suffered some <br /> material damage due to the alleged error by the consultant. <br /> Step 1 Potential Consultant Design Error(s) is Identified by Agency's Project Manager <br /> At the first indication of potential consultant design error(s), the first step in the process is for the <br /> Agency's project manager to notify the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer regarding the <br /> potential design error(s). For federally funded projects, the Region Local Programs Engineer should be <br /> informed and involved in these procedures. (Note: The Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer <br /> may appoint an agency staff person other than the project manager, who has not been as directly <br /> involved in the project,to be responsible for the remaining steps in these procedures.) <br /> Step 2 Project Manager Documents the Alleged Consultant Design Error(s) <br /> After discussion of the alleged design error(s) and the magnitude of the alleged error(s), and with the <br /> Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer's concurrence, the project manager obtains more detailed <br /> documentation than is normally required on the project.Examples include all decisions and descriptions <br /> of work,photographs, records of labor,materials, and equipment. <br /> Step 3 Contact the Consultant Regarding the Alleged Design Error(s) <br /> If it is determined that there is a need to proceed further, the next step in the process is for the project <br /> manager to contact the consultant regarding the alleged design error(s) and the magnitude of the alleged <br /> error(s). The project manager and other appropriate agency staff should represent the agency and the <br /> consultant should be represented by their project manager and any personnel(including sub-consultants) <br /> deemed appropriate for the alleged design error(s) issue. <br /> Step 4 Attempt to Resolve Alleged Design Error with Consultant <br /> After the meeting(s) with the consultant have been completed regarding the consultant's alleged design <br /> error(s),there are three possible scenarios: <br /> • It is determined via mutual agreement that there is not a consultant design error(s). If this is the case, <br /> then the process will not proceed beyond this point. <br /> • It is determined via mutual agreement that a consultant design error(s) occurred. If this is the case, <br /> then the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer, or their representatives,negotiate a settlement <br /> with the consultant. The settlement would be paid to the agency or the amount would be reduced <br /> from the consultant's agreement with the agency for the services on the project in which the design <br /> error took place. The agency is to provide LP, through the Region Local Programs Engineer, a <br /> summary of the settlement for review and to make adjustments, if any, as to how the settlement <br /> affects federal reimbursements.No further action is required. <br /> • There is not a mutual agreement regarding the alleged consultant design error(s). The consultant may <br /> request that the alleged design error(s) issue be forwarded to the Director of Public Works or Agency <br /> Engineer for review.If the Director of Public Works or Agency Engineer, after review with their legal <br /> counsel,is not able to reach mutual agreement with the consultant,proceed to Step 5. <br /> • <br /> 3750-01 <br /> Local Agency A&EProfessional Services <br /> Agreement Number _ <br /> Negotiated Hourly Rate Consultant Agreement Revised 02/01/2021 <br />