Laserfiche WebLink
20 <br />FY 2022 PSGP NOFO Back to the Top <br />administrative costs) and any appropriate narrative. Review panels must be able to <br />thoroughly evaluate the projects being submitted based on the information provided. <br />Consequently, applicants must provide an appropriate level of detail within the budget detail <br />worksheets to clarify what will be purchased and spent. Applications that do not include a <br />detailed budget narrative will not be considered for funding. Detailed budgets often assist <br />reviewers in determining what type of equipment or service is being purchased, which may <br />assist in determining the effectiveness of a project. Additionally, a detailed budget must <br />demonstrate the required cost share, either cash (hard) or third-party in-kind (soft), of the <br />recipient based on the projected project cost. Applications failing to demonstrate the required <br />cost share will not be considered for funding. <br /> <br />Cash and third-party in-kind matches must consist of eligible costs (i.e., same allowability as <br />the federal share), reasonable and necessary to complete the project, and must be identified as <br />part of the submitted budget detail worksheet. A cash (hard) match includes cash spent for <br />project-related costs while a third-party in-kind (soft) match includes the valuation of in-kind <br />services. The cost match requirement for a PSGP award may not be met by funds from <br />another federal grant or assistance program or funds used to meet matching requirements for <br />another federal grant program. Likewise, third-party in-kind matches used to meet the <br />matching requirement for the PSGP award may not be used to meet matching requirements <br />for any other federal grant program. Please see “Cost Share” in section C of this funding <br />notice, also reference 2 C.F.R. § 200.306, as applicable, for further guidance regarding cost <br />matching. <br /> <br />Applicants must use the following file naming convention when submitting their budget <br />detail worksheets as part of the FY 2022 PSGP: <br /> <br />Name of Applicant_Name of Project_Budget Number (Example: XYZ <br />Oil_Fencing_Budget #1) <br /> <br />IV. MOU/MOA REQUIREMENT FOR SECURITY SERVICES PROVIDERS <br />State and local agencies that are identified in the AMSP of their respective COTP/Federal <br />Maritime Security Coordinator (FMSC) as providing security services to one or more MTSA <br />regulated facilities within a Port Area may apply for PSGP funding. However, state and local <br />agencies that are not specifically identified in their respective AMSP but are otherwise <br />required to provide port security services must have a signed MOU/MOA between the <br />security service agency and the MTSA regulated facilities receiving these services within <br />the applicant Port Area prior to receipt of PSGP funding and must include an <br />acknowledgement of the security services, roles, and responsibilities of all entities involved. <br />This includes agencies or entities that are new to the port area or are newly participating in <br />Area Maritime Security Committee activities but are not yet included in the AMSP. These <br />entities must have an MOU/MOA with the respective MTSA regulated facility pending <br />AMSP updates. This information must be maintained by the grant recipient and provided to <br />DHS/FEMA upon request; or verification through the field review process that the agency is <br />identified within the MOU/MOA as an entity that provides maritime security services or is <br />otherwise required to provide port security services. The MOU/MOA must address the <br />following points: