Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br /> Drew Martin <br /> From: Drew Martin <br /> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 5:56 PM <br /> To: restechusa@gmail.com <br /> Subject: City of Everett Permit Services: 318 SE Everett Mall Way, Suite 101 (B2101-053) - Second <br /> Building Intake Review <br /> Mr. Montoya, <br /> I have reviewed the documents submitted in response to the First Building Intake Review emailed on <br /> 02/04/2021. Construction-level documents have not been submitted as required in first review. In addition to the <br /> comments in that email, please note the following: <br /> 1. The plans submitted are sketch-level representations of the space and are not adequate for the purpose of <br /> issuing a building permit. <br /> 2. Only one copy of an original pencil drawings was provided. Two copies of non-revisable documents should be <br /> submitted. <br /> 3. The architectural sketches appear to indicate revisions to the floor plan of the space. Construction-level details <br /> are required. The plan must include dimensions, sizes of egress doors and hallways, egress distances, etc. Walls <br /> should be drawn at nominal thicknesses. The plans should use common drafting standards to differentiate <br /> between new and existing work. <br /> 4. The occupant load and egress paths should be specified in the architectural drawings. The occupancy <br /> classification of the space and construction type of the building should be specified. <br /> 5. The structural sketches in the calculation package do not represent structural drawings. Structural drawings <br /> should be submitted on the same size paper and using a consistent scale as the architectural drawings. <br /> 6. The geometry of the framing plan shown in the structural calculations is not consistent with the hand sketches <br /> of the space(i.e., "L" shaped vs rectangular). <br /> 7. The framing plan in the structural calculations appears to indicate that the framing above is an office floor. The <br /> building at the provided address does not appear to have two stories. In addition, the drawings do not include a <br /> key plan as directed in the first review comments. The proposed work is not clear. <br /> 8. Continuing with the previous comment,the construction type of the building should be specified. Fire-resistive <br /> construction may be required for the structural modifications. <br /> 9. The proposed structural modifications appear to occur within the demising wall(s)with the adjacent <br /> spaces. Details should be provided. Fire-resistive construction may be required if the walls are fire-rated <br /> construction. The required fire area(s) should be determined. <br /> 10. The project involves modifications to the space. Accessibility improvements should be performed as required <br /> per IEBC Section 705.2. <br /> Please contact me if you have questions. <br /> Drew Martin, P.E.,S.E. <br /> imAssociate Engineer—Commercial Plans Examiner I Permit Services <br /> 425.257.8813 13200 Cedar Street, 2nd Floor, Everett,WA 98201 <br /> EVERETT Hours: M/W/Th/F: 7:30am-12:0Opm & 1:O0pm-3:OOpm;Tu: 1:00pm-3:00pm <br /> everettwa.gov I Facebook I Twitter <br /> I. <br />