My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3500 TERMINAL AVE Geotech Report 2022-10-25
>
Address Records
>
TERMINAL AVE
>
3500
>
Geotech Report
>
3500 TERMINAL AVE Geotech Report 2022-10-25
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2022 2:11:00 PM
Creation date
8/25/2022 11:06:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
TERMINAL AVE
Street Number
3500
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Port of Everett—South Terminal Wharf& Electrical Upgrades—Phase 2 125 <br /> Table 21 — WEAP Analysis Results for APE D100-52 Hammer <br /> Allow. APE D100-42 Hammer <br /> Pile <br /> Compressive <br /> Pile Rows Diameter Max Compressive Max Blows per <br /> Resistance <br /> (in) Stress (ksi) Foot <br /> (kip) <br /> A,B,C 18 265 39.1 7 <br /> A' 24 360* 44.4 10 <br /> D,E 18 305 44.4 11_ <br /> • <br /> F,G,G' 24 660 44.7 32 <br /> *Maximum allowable compressive resistance corresponding to compressive stress less than 45 ksi(0.9*Fy)for <br /> selected hammer. <br /> Additional Considerations.The output produced by the wave equation analyses depends on the pile, <br /> hammer, and soil input parameters.We selected input parameters based nearby field explorations, <br /> laboratory tests, previous pile driving and dynamic testing,and manufacturer-supplied hammer <br /> information.Actual field conditions, project requirements, and hammer type and performance may vary <br /> from what we have assumed;therefore,the actual drivability and driving stresses may differ from those <br /> presented above. <br /> Our analyses did not include possible effects of pile installation such as interruptions to driving and <br /> subsequent pile setup. Our assessment assumed an equal distribution of the total resistance between the <br /> pile toe and shaft. Instances in which the piles are primarily end bearing may result in increased <br /> compressive stresses than our calculations predict. Given the high stresses computed for the pile loads, it <br /> is critical that field observation of the piles with the PDA occur.Additionally,the driving stresses computed <br /> by the GRLWEAP program do not include stresses that might result from bending or torsion. For best <br /> driving performance, it will be important for the contractor to adequately prepare the pile top for driving, <br /> use a pile helmet that fits the pile, and maintain the vertical alignment of the hammer, cushions, helmet, <br /> and pile. <br /> Monitoring During Pile Driving <br /> Pile driving stresses can be measured indirectly in the field using a PDA or estimated using a wave equation <br /> computer program such as WEAP. We recommend that pile installation monitoring activities include the <br /> following: <br /> • Verify adequacy of the hammer, cushion, and cap block before beginning driving with a drivability <br /> analysis completed by the Contractor and reviewed the by the Port's Geotechnical Engineer, <br /> • Ensure proper pile handling before driving, <br /> • Record the hammer operating characteristics such as fuel setting,stroke, and hammer blows per <br /> minute, <br /> • Record the hammer blows per foot of pile penetration, <br /> 1.� 19232-01 <br /> H/ARTCROwSER December 6,2017 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.