Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> 39 <br />ARTICLE 27 - HEALTH AND SAFETY <br /> <br />The parties recognize that manning (crew size, on duty shift force) vitally affects the efficient and <br />economic operation of the Department in providing the best possible service to the community and, <br />further, that changes from the present minimum level agreed to in prior contracts do affect the safety and <br />job security of the members of the Union, and therefore agree as follows: <br /> <br />The City agrees to maintain a firefighting force of at least thirty-four (34) firefighters on duty at all times. <br />The City further agrees to maintain at least three (3) firefighters on each fire suppression company, one of <br />whom shall be a captain; to maintain two (2) firefighters on each aid car and to maintain a battalion chief <br />who shall be on duty with each fire suppression platoon. <br /> <br />The City further agrees to use the attrition method in reaching the thirty-four (34) firefighter minimum <br />crew level. Attrition is defined as voluntary quit, dismissal for just and sufficient cause, permanent <br />disability, retirement or death. <br /> <br />Provided, however, that notwithstanding the foregoing, the City may, during the course of the contract <br />year, seek to effect a change in the minimum manning provided by paragraph one above. If the City <br />desires to effect such change, it shall propose to the Union a written proposal as to the reduction sought <br />including reason for the change, prior to the date of the change. At least 90 days prior to the proposed <br />effective date of the change, the City shall meet with representatives of the Union at reasonable times and <br />places for the purpose of exploring the advisability of the change and agreement to the change. If the <br />parties fail to agree to the change within 60 days of the first formal conference, the parties shall submit <br />the proposal to arbitration as provided for by Article 6, Step 4. The Arbitrator shall resolve the issue <br />based upon a finding that the proposal of the City will improve efficiency of service and that it does not <br />reasonably impair the safety of the firefighting force. <br /> <br />