My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2320 RAILWAY AVE INTERWEST CONSTRUCTION INC Geotech Report 2023-02-17
>
Address Records
>
RAILWAY AVE
>
2320
>
INTERWEST CONSTRUCTION INC
>
Geotech Report
>
2320 RAILWAY AVE INTERWEST CONSTRUCTION INC Geotech Report 2023-02-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2023 9:18:12 AM
Creation date
2/17/2023 9:17:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
RAILWAY AVE
Street Number
2320
Tenant Name
INTERWEST CONSTRUCTION INC
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Interwest Construction Co.-Railway Avenue Improvements,Everett,WA Feb. 14,2019/Revised Feb. 7,2020 <br /> Geotechnical Engineering Report P1486-T18 <br /> would not be suitable for reuse as structural fill due to its high relative organics <br /> content. If clean, fine to medium sands are encountered, free of organics or wood, <br /> they may be well-suited for use as structural fill. <br /> Permanent Slopes: All permanent cut slopes and fill slopes should be adequately inclined to reduce <br /> long-term raveling,sloughing,and erosion. We generally recommend that no permanent slopes be <br /> steeper than 2H:1V. For all soil types, the use of flatter slopes (such as 21/2H:1V) would further <br /> reduce long-term erosion and facilitate revegetation. <br /> Slope Protection: We recommend that a permanent berm, swale, or curb be constructed along the <br /> top edge of all permanent slopes to intercept surface flow. Also, a hardy vegetative groundcover <br /> should be established as soon as feasible, to further protect the slopes from runoff water erosion. <br /> Alternatively,permanent slopes could be armored with quarry spalls or a geosynthetic erosion mat. <br /> 4.2 Subsurface Utilities <br /> Improvement plans for this project include a 12-inch water line and a 54-inch storm line. Listed <br /> below are excavation methods and construction considerations for the placement of the utilities. <br /> 4.2.1 Excavation Methods <br /> In our opinion,conventional trenchingmethods usingtrench boxes and open cuts are feasible at this <br /> P � p <br /> site. Construction dewatering may be required as discussed above. It should be expected that <br /> buried organics or timber could be present along the pipeline alignment which may be difficult to <br /> excavate. <br /> 4.2.2 Open Cut Slopes <br /> If open cuts are used,we expect that temporary slopes of 11/2:1 (horizontal to vertical)can be used as <br /> a guide for cuts in the loose to medium dense deposits encountered in the test borings. These <br /> guidelines assume that surface loads such as equipment loads and storage loads will be kept a <br /> sufficient distance away from the top of the cut so that the stability of the slope is not affected. The <br /> guidelines also assume that the excavations will be dewatered in such a way that significant <br /> seepage is not present on the slope face. Flatter slopes and/or shoring might be necessary for those <br /> portions of the excavations which are subjected to significant seepage in order to maintain the <br /> stability of the cut. All temporary slopes should be constructed in accordance with applicable <br /> WISHA Guidelines. <br /> It should be expected that the excavation face will experience some sloughing and raveling. Heavy <br /> plastic sheeting should be used to protect the exposed face from erosion due to rainfall. Berms, <br /> swales,or drainage ditches should be installed around the perimeter of the excavation to intercept <br /> surface runoff. <br /> At locations where a slope retention system is not required due to space limitations,we believe that <br /> the contractor should have the primary responsibility for the decision as to whether or not to use an <br /> open cut slope rather than a retention system,and for determining the slope angle. The presence of <br /> buried utilities close to the excavation should be considered when evaluating the need for a slope <br /> retention system. <br /> ' Migizi Group, Inc. Page 8 of 13 <br /> �Ijl <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.