My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3632 RUCKER AVE THE LANDING AT PORT GARDNER 2023-04-06
>
Address Records
>
RUCKER AVE
>
3632
>
THE LANDING AT PORT GARDNER
>
3632 RUCKER AVE THE LANDING AT PORT GARDNER 2023-04-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2023 3:14:26 PM
Creation date
4/6/2023 3:10:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
RUCKER AVE
Street Number
3632
Tenant Name
THE LANDING AT PORT GARDNER
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ef1GIf1EER5 <br /> g Washington <br /> Oregon <br /> California September 6, 2018 <br /> Texas <br /> Alaska Charlie Morgan Jr. <br /> Colorado 7301 Beverly Lane <br /> g Montana Everett, WA 98203 <br /> The following structural comments are in response to the initial building permit <br /> review: <br /> Structural <br /> 1. On Sheet S2.1 Grid 1/E and Sheet C4.1 in the Civil Drawing set,there is a 'Flow Control <br /> Structure"with a rim elevation of 188.50 feet. The top of slab on this sheet is 181 '9 <br /> Please clarify if a site retaining wall is required at this location and if the opening shown <br /> in this area needs to revised or relocated based on the proposed rim elevation of the 'Flow <br /> Control Structure': <br /> The architect confirmed the flow structure is "well away" from the nearest concrete <br /> foundation/retaining wall. <br /> 2. It appears that the redundancy factor, p, of 1.0, per ASCE 7-10 12.3.4.2, was included <br /> in the design of the lateral systems in either the concrete or the wood portions of the <br /> structure. Please provide supporting calculations to verify that these lateral systems in <br /> both orthogonal directions meet the requirements of p= 1.0. Otherwise,please provide <br /> design calculations and revise the lateral design as required to satisfy the increase due to <br /> the redundancy factor,p=1.3. <br /> Proved redundancy does exist per ASCE 12.3.4.2 "a." in conjunction with table 12.3-3, <br /> see hand calculations under"lateral analysis design." <br /> 3. Based on the use of the Equivalent Lateral Force procedure in ASCE 7-10 Sec 12.8. Please <br /> provide drift calculations to verify that the Torsional Amplification factor,Ax,does not <br /> need to be increased more than 1.0 per ASCE 7-10 12.8.4.3. <br /> This is not applicable due to there being no torsional or extreme torsional irregularity <br /> (see comment 4). <br /> 4. Please provide checks for structural irregularities for both structures concrete and wood <br /> portions per Tables 12.3-1 and 12.3-2 in ASCE 7-10. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.