My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3632 RUCKER AVE THE LANDING AT PORT GARDNER 2023-04-06
>
Address Records
>
RUCKER AVE
>
3632
>
THE LANDING AT PORT GARDNER
>
3632 RUCKER AVE THE LANDING AT PORT GARDNER 2023-04-06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2023 3:14:26 PM
Creation date
4/6/2023 3:10:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
RUCKER AVE
Street Number
3632
Tenant Name
THE LANDING AT PORT GARDNER
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
225
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ef1Gtf1EER5 <br /> Washington <br /> q Oregon Increased controlling lateral loads due to reentrant corner irregularity. Proved no <br /> e e9° <br /> California torsional irregularity based on diaphragm boundary deflections, see hand calculations <br /> 2'i Texas under"lateral analysis design." <br /> = i Alaska <br /> Colorado 5. Permit calculations for the concrete column design do not appear to include tie design <br /> g PP <br /> Montana check requirements per ACI 318-14 Sec 18.14.3. Please provide calculations and revise <br /> tie designs are required. <br /> Concrete column design, including tie design, can be found in the revised calculations. <br /> Design displacements were checked so we proceeded with 18.14.3.2. See hand <br /> calculations under"concrete column analysis." <br /> 6. It appears that concrete dowel designs between PT slab to concrete shear wall elements <br /> are using a qP=0.75 rather than the factor of 0.6 per ACI 318-14 Sec 21.2.4.2 as this <br /> would correspond to the 0.6 factor used in concrete shear wall designs calculations. <br /> Please revise dowel design as required. <br /> Concrete dowel design between PT slab and concrete shear walls has been revised to <br /> use a factor of 0.6 instead of 0.75 per ACI 318-14 section 21.2.4.2. See hand calculations <br /> under"concrete diaphragm analysis." <br /> Do not hesitate to contact us with any further questions, comments, or concerns. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> / 64- 4.. <br /> Tanner Grimstad, EIT Troy E. Bean, PE, SE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.