1716 HOYT AVE 2023-04-07 - Laserfiche WebLink

• Drew Martin From: Drew Martin Sent: Wednesday,June 2, 2021 2:43 PM To: kingjulie@comcast.com Subject: City of Everett Permit Services: 1716 Hoyt Avenue (B2105-051) - First Building Intake Review Hello, Mr. King. Your application has been received and a permit set up. However, the submitted documents are not sufficient for us to perform a review at this time. Revised construction-level documents need to be submitted for review. Preliminary comments are provided below to assist in revising the drawings, but these are not intended to provide a comprehensive review. 1. The drawings have been submitted on 8.5x11 paper and do not match the stated %"=1'-0" scale. The drawings are not legible at the submitted size. Please submit larger drawings that match the drawing scale. Small text should be increase to be legible;verify that text has been completely printed as portions appear to have printed incorrectly. 2. The submittal included structural calculations. It appears that the design, or portions of it, require an engineered design per IRC Section R301.1.3. Engineered designs are required to be sealed and signed by the licensed engineer preparing the documents. See RCW 18.43. 3. The General Notes on Sheet 4 should revise the "seismic zone" criteria to state "Seismic Design Category D2". 4. The plans appear to require demolition of the existing north wall, portions of the east and west walls, and part of the roof along the north edge. The extent of the demolition should be shown in the "Existing Structure" plan. See IRC Section R106.1.1. 5. Continuing with the previous comment,the roof along the north edge is losing vertical support from the demolished wall. A section should be provided along this edge should the construction remaining and the new support condition(s). See IRC Section R106.1.1 and Chapter 8. 6. The design appears to include a truss over the new north wall. Based on the proposed roof height,full height studs exceed the height limit permitted by the IRC. The studs are not continuous to the roof sheathing and will require out-of-plane bracing. This is typically provided by braces extending from the top plate to the roof sheathing. A detail should be provided. Note that the stability bracing per the truss manufacturer is not intended for this purpose. 7. The braced wall line along Grid C is offset from the existing east wall by 5 feet, exceeding the maximum 4-foot offset permitted per IRC Section R602.10.1.2. The new wall is required to be its own wall line. Per Table R602.10.3(3), the minimum braced length is approximately 5 feet (SDC D2). Per Table R602.10.5, 30-inch CS-WSP panels limit the adjacent opening height to 80 inches. This should be specified in the elevations. The height of the wall panels should be dimensioned for clarity(limited to 10 feet). 8. The north-south direction of the building exceeds the maximum braced wall line spacing of 25 feet per Table R602.10.1.3. An additional braced line at D is required. A minimum of 2 braced panels are required per IRC Section R602.10.2.3;the braced wall line extends the full width of the building (i.e., 25 feet). A panel is required at each end per Section R602.10.2.2.1. 9. The drawings appear to specify wall panel Type CS-PF per Figure R602.10.6.5. The following should be addressed: 1