8401 HOLLY DR VOICESTREAM 2018-01-02 MF Import

� ( �. (h) The above ground utility or communications facility shall be removed from the site should the use for such purposes be discontinued for one hundred twerty days or more. (i) Maintenance, repair, or replacement of existing utility or communications facilities or appurtenant structures and the installation of minor above ground utility and cornmur�ications facilities of a minor nature and small scale are exempt from this, section. Q) To the extent provided by law, the City may require utility or communications service provider to allow up to two additional service providers to be located on shared facilfties to discourage the prolfferation of tower structures, consistent wRh technological feasibility. (k) Communications facilities which require towers forwhich safety lights a�e required by the FAA shall not be pertnitted unless the Applicant demonstrates that such a facility in the proposed location and at such a height is necessary to aclequately serve the needs of the public for the proposed utility or communications service. (I) The Planning Director may require review by an expert third oarty when needed for review of site-spec�c data submitted by the Applicant conceming technical aspects related to specific facilities and locations. 18. No tower structures will be built. The antennas wiil be placed on a PUD pole, eliminating any new cellular communication tower or monopole. (exhibit 1) 19. The Applicant did consider altemate sites because the demands that have been created with the increaspd use in this location of the City. Any altemate sites would be outside the proposed service area. (exhibit 1) 20. Because of the technology involved, the utility pole and the antennas cannot be underground. The support equipment wili be located on grade within a cabinet. (exhibit 1) 21. Sixty-three feet is the minimum height necessary for the proposed facil'ity in order to provide the service to this portion of the City �f Everett. (Spencer testimony) 22. The Applicant testified that its equipment wouid be removed if there were any financial failures of the company. The facility would also be removed ff the use was discontinued for 120 days or more. (exhibits 1 & 3) 23. Because of the location of the PUD pole, the facility is not a potential site for collocation of other communication facilities. The Applicant has collocated with the PUD. (exhi6it 1) 24. No lights are proposed for this pole. (exhibit 1) �