8401 HOLLY DR VOICESTREAM 2018-01-02 MF Import

� � (. Department has not requested improvements to the City right-of-way. The Aoplicant has shown that the streets, utilities, and public services are adequs+a for the proposal to be located in the requested location. (exhibit 1, Ingalsbe testimony, Spencer testimony) 7. No tra�c will be�enerated to the facil'rry. Only one vehicular maintenanc�truck will visit the facility. The facility will not create a significant impact on traffic. (exhibff 1, Ingalsbe testimony) 8. One off-street parking space is required by code to sorve the proposed facility. The site has adequate area for this parking area. Adequate parking is available. (exhibit 1) 9. Antennas would be placed on the top of the pole and would be camouflaged or screened to blend in with the pole. There would be fiour 4" condufts extending from the base of the pole to the three antennas. The pole would be compatible with other properties in the area. (exhibit 1) 10. In R-1 zones, a 20-fcot front setback, a five-foot rear and side setback, and a 10- foot street side setback are required. The equipment compound would be located on a comer lot, and the setback standards apply. Based on information provided, all setbacks would be satisfied, as would any lot area requirements. (There appears to be no minimum lot area requirements for above ground communication facilities). (exhibit 1). 11. If any signs are located on site, (none are proposed)they must be Category D signs. (exhibit 1) 12. The site must be landscaped with Landscape Category B standards. These standards include a ten-foo4 wide landscape strip with Type III landscaping along 7th Street S.E. The site is currenUy landscaped with lawn and native vegetation, and the Applicant proposes to place landscaping around the equipment compaund. All requirements of landscaping, buffering, and screening wiil be met and wi�l be beneficial to the adjoining properties. (exhibit 1 j 13. Construction will create some irritants of noise, smoke, dust, odor, glare, and vi�ual blight. The communication facility would not generate a significant amount of visual blight, and the proposal is c�nsistent with the regulations of the City of Everett. (exhibit 1) 14. The subject property has an Everert General Comprehensive Plan designation of 2.1, Schools and Churchas. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. (exhibit 1) 15. The proposal will satisfy all requirements of the Special � roperty Use Permit ordinance, as weil as other State, Federal, and City regulations. (exhibit 1) Y�