Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> Mr. Art Skotdal <br /> Skotdal Real Estate <br /> Plan Check Number: PW1907-055, First Building Review - Shoring <br /> August 2, 2019 <br /> figure may be intended to represent loading for neither of these two systems (e.g., cantilever or <br /> single-tieback wall systems). It is noted that the version of Figure 3 submitted to the city does <br /> not depict a tieback, or reference either a tieback or a cantilever system, which are indicated on <br /> the consultant's version of the report. Lastly, Figure 3 only includes 4 notes, verses <br /> approximately 9 in the consultant's version. The applicability of Figure 3 should be clarified. <br /> The correct version of Figure 3 should be included in the report. Alternatively, the figure should <br /> be removed. <br /> 7. The proposed shoring system includes a wide-flange and steel-brace system in the northeast <br /> corner of the Shoring Plan on Sheet SS2.0. See also Section 4/SS4.1. Recommendations for <br /> the soil design parameters on this system should be provided in the report. <br /> 8. The Shoring Plan on Sheet SS2.0 includes multiple"vertical soil nails"along the portions of the <br /> system adjacent to the existing buildings. The vertical soil nails consist of wide-flange sections <br /> that are both non-continuous to or minimally-embedded in the bottom-of-excavation soils. The <br /> purpose of these elements and their contribution to the wall system should be discussed in the <br /> recommended. Additional design parameters associated with these elements should be <br /> provided as needed. <br /> 9. The recommendations for the various shoring wall systems appear to generally address wall <br /> systems with flat backfill. The proposed shoring system includes walls supporting sloping <br /> backfills at multiple locations. The recommendations should be revised to incorporate additional <br /> soil pressures due to sloping backfills. <br /> 10. The recommendations for the various shoring wall systems do not include live load surcharges, <br /> or limit the surcharge pressures to a value consistent with a 250 psf live load. The propose <br /> shoring design includes live loads in excess of this value. Sheet Sections 8/SS4.1 and 9/SS4.1. <br /> The shoring plans also show building loads of up to 400 psf per Sections 1/SS4.1, 2/SS4.1, and <br /> 6/SS4.1. The recommendations should be revised as needed to address the proposed loading. <br /> Structural <br /> 1. The geotechnical report included in the submittal documents was prepared by Associated Earth <br /> Sciences, Inc., dated May 28, 2019. The report was discussed via telephone with Steve Siebert <br /> on August 1, 2019. Based a review of the report and discussion with Mr. Siebert, it appears the <br /> report may contain multiple discrepancies and omissions. A copy of the report is provided at <br /> the beginning of the structural calculations. It is noted that the Figure 3 included in the version <br /> included in the calculations is not consistent with geotechnical recommendations in the <br /> narrative, nor is it consistent with the geotechnical report included with the submittal <br /> documents. The structural calculations also does not include the Figure 4 included in the <br /> geotechnical report. See other comments in the Geotechnical section of this review letter. The <br /> recommended soil design parameters shall be verified, and the structural design shall be <br /> reviewed and revised as needed. See IBC Section 1604.1. <br /> 0 3200 Cedar Street © 425.257.8810 O everetteps@everettwa.gov <br /> Everett,WA 98201 425.257.8857 fax everettwa.gov/permits <br /> Page3of5 <br />