Laserfiche WebLink
• • <br /> 25(H+2) is not intended to be a 2-foot surcharge. The 2 feet is added to the exposed <br /> face of the wall at the base in order to take into consideration the two feet below the <br /> base of the excavation that is disregarded for the passive loading. <br /> 5. The surcharge loads included in the wall calculations by the structural engineer are <br /> suitable for the design of the wall. ( ;' <br /> 6. The Figure 3 included in the report is not the correct Figure 3. The correct Figure is <br /> attached. <br /> 7. This system includes vertical elements and is typical for soil nail wall design. <br /> 8. This is typical soil nail wall design that includes vertical elements. See the structural <br /> engineer review comments <br /> 9. The revised Figure 3 that is attached to the letter includes the recommendations for <br /> sloping backfill. This was used in the design of the shoring system. ru, <br /> 10. The surcharge values used in the design of the shoring system including the live and <br /> dead loads are suitable for the design. J <br /> We hope this information serves your present needs. If you have any questions, please call. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES, INC. <br /> Kirkland, Washington <br /> 1 <br /> f ,f <br /> Matthew A. Miller, P.E. <br /> Principal Engineer <br /> 2 3 <br />