My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2721 WETMORE AVE MARQUEE APARTMENTS 2023-06-28
>
Address Records
>
WETMORE AVE
>
2721
>
MARQUEE APARTMENTS
>
2721 WETMORE AVE MARQUEE APARTMENTS 2023-06-28
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2023 11:11:14 AM
Creation date
6/22/2023 9:57:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
WETMORE AVE
Street Number
2721
Tenant Name
MARQUEE APARTMENTS
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
544
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r ' r 0 •S <br /> ~``� a s s o c i a t e d s//o4 ,L`(/ , <br /> earth sciences <br /> / 47 <br /> August 6, 2019 <br /> Project No. 190168E001 <br /> City of Everett <br /> 3200 Cedar Street <br /> Everett, WA 98201 <br /> ATTN: Mr. Drew Martin <br /> RE: Marquee Apartments Everett Shoring <br /> 2721 Wetmore Avenue, Everett WA <br /> COE #PW1907-055 <br /> Response to First Building Review—Shoring. <br /> Dear Mr. Martin: <br /> As requested, Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) has prepared a response to the Correction <br /> Notice #1 dated August 2, 2019. The comments from the City reviewer are followed by a <br /> response from the geotechnical engineer and are based upon the information obtained from <br /> the original study. It should be noted that the Figure 3 included in the report tat was submitted <br /> is not correct. The correct Figure 3 is attached to this letter and referenced in the following <br /> responses. <br /> 1. The soil parameters given in section 13.1 of the geotechnical report dated May 28, 2019 <br /> were used in the design of the soil nail wall which is the standard for soil nail wall <br /> design. The reference to the pressure diagram in the report is for design guidance to <br /> the external loadings that may apply in the given situations. We have reviewed the <br /> calculations for the sail nail wall and the parameters of the design are consistent with <br /> that given in the geotechnical report. vk� <br /> 2. As noted in the previous response the soil parameters given in the geotechnical report <br /> are what was used in the calculations for soil nail wall design. The reference to Figure 3 <br /> is for surcharge loading including live loads and the sloping backfill. (-1=- <br /> 3. As noted previously Figure 3 is included in the recommendations for the design of a soil <br /> nail wall to indicate the external loadings such as the traffic surcharge. The soil nail wall <br /> design has included a vertical loading for a traffic surcharge of 250 psf, and a 500 psf <br /> load for construction traffic. The loadings also include building loads for the adjacent <br /> properties. All these loadings are suitable for design. Q\t <br /> 4. The 250 psf surcharge included in the Figure 4 and section 13.2 is a traffic loading. This <br /> is translated to a horizontal loading of 75 psf over the top 10 feet in the diagram. The <br /> Kirkland Office 1911 Fifth Avenue I Kirkland,WA 98033 P 1425.827.7701 F 1425.827.5424 <br /> Everett Office 129113.4 Hewitt Avenue,Suite 2 I Everett,WA 98201 P 1425.259.0522 F 1425.252.3408 <br /> www.aesgeo.com <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.