Laserfiche WebLink
Subsurface Exploration, Geologic Hazard, and <br /> 2721 Wetmore Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Report <br /> Everett, Washington Preliminary Design Recommendations <br /> and south should also be included in the design. This section of the report presents preliminary <br /> design considerations and criteria for use in the design of the excavation shoring. With this <br /> information and other pertinent data, it should be the responsibility of the structural engineer or <br /> shoring subcontractor(s) to determine the appropriate design details, construction methods, <br /> and procedures for installation of the shoring system. <br /> 13.1 Soil Nailing <br /> Considering the generally competent nature of the on-site soils, soil nails may prove more <br /> economical and less restrictive than conventional soldier piles and tiebacks. This section of the <br /> report presents preliminary design considerations and criteria that should be considered in the <br /> design of soil nail-supported excavation shoring. <br /> AESI does not provide soil nailing design drawings. We rely on experienced professional <br /> designers and contractors to provide the design drawings and details necessary to obtain <br /> permits. AESI can, however, provide the required inspection and monitoring of proof-testing to <br /> satisfy City of Everett requirements. The following report sections provide the basic <br /> information for the site soils to be used in a soil nail wall design. The final design should satisfy <br /> the criteria presented in this report, moment equilibrium, and installation and performance <br /> criteria required by the City of Everett for temporary soil nail-supported wall construction. <br /> Soil nailing consists of installing a grid pattern of grouted rebar tendons ("nails") into slightly <br /> inclined drilled holes spaced on a vertical soil cut face as excavation proceeds. The soil nail <br /> tendons are typically shorter in length than conventional tieback anchors. This produces a <br /> reinforced zone that is itself stable and helps to support the unreinforced ground behind it. The <br /> nails are passive, in that they are untensioned at the time of installation; over time, they <br /> become tensioned as they resist the deformation of the adjacent soil. The nail reinforcement <br /> improves stability in two ways. First, soil nails reduce the driving force along potential failure <br /> surfaces. Second, in frictional soils, nails increase the normal force and hence the soil shear <br /> resistance along potential slip surfaces. <br /> Wire mesh reinforcement and rebar are attached to the nails and the face of the excavation is <br /> covered with a suitable thickness of air-placed concrete (shotcrete). The advantages of this 'f <br /> technique over shoring that utilizes soldier pile walls is that the shotcrete wall can serve as the 1 <br /> wall of the excavation without the need for deep piles and lagging, it can be constructed while <br /> above-grade work proceeds, and the wall can consist of either the temporary shoring wall alone <br /> or it can be incorporated into the permanent basement wall, providing the potential for <br /> significant cost savings. Due to the depth of excavation at this site, it would be necessary to <br /> first construct the soil nail shoring, then build the structure wall from the bottom up versus J <br /> using the shoring as the permanent basement wall (top down construction). <br /> May 28, 2019 ASSOCIATED EARTH SCIENCES,INC. <br /> FSM/Id-.190168E001-2-Projects\20190168\KE\WP Page 13 <br /> 18185E Page 8 of 180 <br />