6722 HIGHLAND DR 2023-08-01 - Laserfiche WebLink

0 0 Drew Martin From: Drew Martin Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 12:52 PM To: panilladean@gmail.com Subject: RE: City of Everett Permit Services: 6722 Highland Drive SE (B2005-028) - Building Revision Preliminary Review One more comment: 6. Please submit an updated 8.5x11 plan as required for the AFH checklist. _ Drew Martin, P.E., S.E. Associate Engineer — Commercial Plans Examiner I Permit Services 425.257.8810 13200 Cedar Street, 2nd Floor, Everett, WA 98201 EVERETT Phone Hours: M/W/T: 8 am - 12 pm & 1 pm — 3 pm; Tu: 1:OOpm-3:OOpm everettwa.gov/permits I Facebook I Twitter Note: Emails and attachments sent to and from the City of Everett are public records and may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the Public Records Act. From: Drew Martin Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 12:49 PM To: panilladean@gmail.com Subject: City of Everett Permit Services: 6722 Highland Drive SE (62005-028) - Building Revision Preliminary Review Good afternoon, Ms. Wanjiru. We have received a submittal for revisions for the permit listed above. However, the above permit was approved but never issued. Note that is was paid for, but no one picked up the drawings, which we still have at our office. The original drawing that was approved was only a single sheet, while the revision is 11 sheets long. In addition, the current sets submitted for review are missing information in the plan that was provided in the original drawing. Lastly, there appears to be work occurring at the house without a valid permit per Code Enforcement File No. CE21-0112; it is not clear if the work being performed is represented in either the originally -approved or revised drawing. Due to all of these issues, we need to have two complete revised drawing sets submitted for review ton encompass all of the work that has been proposed and performed to -date. I am provided some preliminary comments below to clarify how to proceed. We will perform a comprehensive review once updated drawings are received. Note that the permit application was vested in the past edition of the building code (i.e., 2015 IRC); the revised project is allowed to continue with this edition. Comments: 1. The revised drawings were submitted on 11x17 sheets, which do not appear to be the full-size sheets based on the drawings scales. Full-size drawings consistent with the scales should be submitted. 2. The revised drawings show the modifications in the non -garage areas as existing (i.e., shown as if the work in the original permitted drawing has already been performed). See Sheet P-4. All proposed work from both the original drawing and the new drawings should be shown as new; no work should be shown as existing. 3. Continuing with the previous comment, the previously approved drawing and the currently submitted drawing sets show significant discrepancies in the floor plans. The plans also show discrepancies in the exterior walls (e.g., different windows, etc.). The front of the house appears to have been built out with a new porch, some