My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3003 W CASINO RD PAINT HANGAR BOUNDARIES 2023-07-20
>
Address Records
>
W CASINO RD
>
3003
>
PAINT HANGAR BOUNDARIES
>
3003 W CASINO RD PAINT HANGAR BOUNDARIES 2023-07-20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2023 10:21:20 AM
Creation date
7/20/2023 10:15:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W CASINO RD
Street Number
3003
Tenant Name
PAINT HANGAR BOUNDARIES
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
132
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
aCiGeminus Boeing Project Contract No.EVE-16-2929 <br /> Technology Development CEI Project No. 160731 <br /> 3.2.4 Airflow Only CFD/Measurements Comparison <br /> Direct & precise point by point comparison of velocity values from CFD simulations and the <br /> TAB report is not technically possible due to the lack of sufficiently detailed positional accuracy <br /> of the measurements around the aircraft, regions of high velocity gradients, and the inherent <br /> spatial averaging of the VelGrid velocity instrument. The precise location (i.e. center of the <br /> VelGrid) of where velocity measurements were taken was unknown with only the rough location <br /> drawings and report description available to approximate where to retrieve data from the CFD <br /> solutions. Thus there is expected to be a high degree of experiment scatter and deviation from <br /> the CFD. Figure 22 shows the locations where velocity values were taken from the CFD <br /> simulations. <br /> For measurement locations like the engine, wing LE/TE, and horizontal stabilizer LE/TE <br /> small variations in measurement position will read significantly different velocity numbers. <br /> Measurements along the vertical tail were not considered due to the complete lack of clarity on <br /> where the velocity measurements were taken and the large degree of flow variation in that area. <br /> 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.