Laserfiche WebLink
ILICGeminus Boeing Project Contract No.EVE-16-2929 <br /> Technology Development CEI Project No. 160731 <br /> 0 0 0 0 <br /> 0 0 0 <br /> .0 0 0 <br /> 0. 00. 0 e o <br /> Mean of PercentOfLEL Mean of PercentOfLEL <br /> 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 <br /> Figure 82: % of LEL contour cross section cut #7 & #8 (see Figure 59) for Case <br /> 3/Scenario 1 b. <br /> • <br /> • <br /> Mean of PercentOfLEL Mean of PercentOfLEL <br /> 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 <br /> 1111 EMI <br /> Figure 83: % of LEL contour cross section cut #9 & #10 (see Figure 59) for Case <br /> 3/Scenario lb. <br /> 4.5 Case 3/Scenario 2b-75% Ventilation Mode, Wing & Horizontal Stabilizer Paint <br /> Configuration 2 <br /> Case 3/Scenario 2b models the hangar airflow and volatile concentration while the ventilation <br /> system is at 75% normal mode, and painting is taking place at the forward, mid, and aft sections <br /> of the fuselage, at the top of the wing at mid-span, and at the top of the horizontal stabilizer at <br /> mid-span/mid-chord. The HSP was raised up to -2' below the horizontal stabilizer. The high <br /> bay stacker was moved to allow the painter to exit onto the HSP as illustrated in Figure 84. The <br /> 79 <br />