Laserfiche WebLink
Geminus Boeing Project Contract No.TechnologyDevelopment CEI Project No. 160731 <br /> 0 <br /> 0 0 0 : o 0 0 0 <br /> 0 0 <br /> 0 0 <br /> 0 = 0 <br /> 0 El [ 0 <br /> o 0 0 0 <br /> Mean of PercentOfLEL Mean of PercentOfLEL <br /> 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 <br /> 1111111.11111 :I MIK MI <br /> Figure 97: % of LEL contour cross section cut #7 & #8 (see Figure 59) for Case <br /> 3/Scenario 2b. <br /> Mean of PercentOfLEL Mean of PercentOfLEL <br /> 0.00 0.5 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.71100 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 ii00 <br /> Figure 98: % of LEL contour cross section cut #9 & #10 (see Figure 59) for Case <br /> 3/Scenario 2b. <br /> 4.6 Case 3/Scenario 3b-75% Ventilation Mode, Wing & Horizontal Stabilizer Paint <br /> Configuration 3 <br /> Case 3/Scenario 3b models the hangar airflow and volatile concentration while the ventilation <br /> system is at 75% normal mode, and painting is taking place at the forward, mid, and aft sections <br /> of the fuselage, on the top of the wing near the folded up tip, and at the bottom of the horizontal <br /> stabilizer at mid-span/mid-chord. The high bay stacker was moved to allow the painter to exit <br /> onto the HSP when configured 6-1/2' below the bottom surface of the horizontal stabilizer as <br /> 89 <br />