Laserfiche WebLink
Category 2: Sensitive information <br />Page 2 of 3 Category 2: For official use only / disclosure permissible by law <br />Describe your efforts to identify <br />other potential sources. <br />Per the attached letter, APSCO is the exclusive representative for the sale <br />and support of all Flowserve pumps in the state of Washington. <br />List any other facts supporting the <br />use of a non-competitive process. <br />If required to change equipment, the city would need to research <br />compatible pumps for the system, potentially reconfigure the current <br />systems to accommodate the replacement equipment, and train staff on <br />the operations, maintenance, and repair requirements of the new units. <br />The Cost for the city would be upwards of $500,000 per pump to <br />accommodate new equipment. <br />Is this a one-time procurement? <br /> No* Yes <br />*If an on-going sole source procurement is required, include or attach an <br />estimate that shows total annualized expenditure for each year. <br />PRICE REASONABLENESS (Check all that apply and attach back-up documentation) <br />I determined that the price is fair and reasonable because: <br /> I compared the proposed price to prices I previously paid for the same or similar goods and/or services. See PO # <br /> . Specify price: <br /> I compared the proposed price to current published catalog, price lists, or mark et prices as documented in the <br />attachments and the proposed price is similar or less. Attach relevant documentation. <br /> I compared the proposed price to rough yardsticks, such as dollars per pound, per horsepower, or other units of <br />measure and did not discover significant inconsistencies that warrant additional pricing inquiry. <br /> Based on my knowledge of the market, my experience of prior similar proposals, or knowledge imparted by <br />technical experts. <br /> The price is set by law or regulations. <br /> Market research reveals that same or similar goods or services are available for a similar price. <br /> Other: ________________________________________________________________________ <br /> Back-up documentation is attached. <br /> <br />Explanation of above-checked justification: The city has made similar purchases from APSCO, LLC, and based on inflation <br />and market conditions, price increases have been consistent. <br /> <br /> <br />STATEMENT OF NEED AND CERTIFICATION: <br />My department’s recommendation for sole source is based upon an objective review of the product/service required and <br />appears to be in the best interest of the City of Everett. I know of no conflict of interest on my part or personal <br />involvement in any way with this request. No gratuities, favors, or compromising action have taken place. Neither has my <br />personal familiarity with particular brands, types of equipment, materials or firms been a deciding influence on my <br />request to sole source this purchase when there are other known suppliers to exist. <br />I hereby certify that this justification for sole source procurement is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge <br />and belief. <br /> <br /> <br />Signature (Requestor) Date <br />Printed Name: Doug Nance Title: Utilities Maintenance Tech III <br />DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR <br />Based upon the above, I authorize the sole source acquisition of the goods or services specified. <br /> <br /> <br />Signature Date <br />Printed Name: Ryan Sass_____________________________________________________________________ <br />INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY – For any technology purchases including software