Laserfiche WebLink
reading is a vertical line sloping away that describes the edge of the upper roof <br /> as it slopes away. No change needed. Also,the top of the concrete stern walls <br /> shown will be lowered, consistent with other details on the page. <br /> 5. OK. Additional section added and cut on Sheet A2.0 <br /> 6. OK. Three detail cuts added. <br /> 7. Architect to provide. <br /> 8. OK. Section cut and section added. Load to footing= .04(5)(2) <br /> .07(14.513)(7)=2.76K > l'-6" sq X 8" w/(2)#4 EW. Will change footing <br /> size on plan and also show in section. <br /> 9. The 1000# allowance has been used by many structural engineers and <br /> allowed by many jurisdictions for many years, as the lateral analysis procedure, <br /> and the"practice" of engineering, is an inexact at best. However, for this <br /> jurisdiction, Simpson HDU2-SDS2.5 hold downs have been specified with#4 <br /> Gr 60 threaded re bar inserted 5" minimum into the existing concrete stem wall <br /> with Simpson SET-XP epoxy grout.. Updated calculation sheets 17 and 19 <br /> have been attached. Hold downs noted on Sheet A2.0 on"Proposed Main <br /> Level Floor Plan", and hold down description added on A2.o <br /> 10. Statement was already included. A note regarding the special inspection <br /> required for concrete embeds has already been provided. See "Special <br /> Inspection Required For" section in the Structural Notes. No changes needed. <br /> 11. This request is really an over-kill here, but the pages will be added and <br /> also a note to the Framing notes to refer to IRC Table R602.3 (5) for all <br /> standard nailing not called out in the plans. Realistically though, the <br /> contractor can Google the chart very easily,plus this is specifying commonly <br /> known and used minimum framing connections. See additional Sheet A2.5. <br /> I trust the above answers are satisfactory. Please call or email if you have any <br /> questions regarding my answers. <br /> 11110 <br />