My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1820 OAKES AVE 2023-12-08
>
Address Records
>
OAKES AVE
>
1820
>
1820 OAKES AVE 2023-12-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2023 1:09:25 PM
Creation date
10/10/2023 9:55:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
OAKES AVE
Street Number
1820
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Drew Martin <br /> From: Drew Martin <br /> Sent: Monday, September 19, 2022 2:52 PM <br /> To: Dean Dariotis;Alex Dariotis <br /> Cc: Ryan Hammer <br /> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] TUCK REMODEL B2203-034 <br /> Attachments: 20220919142423824.pdf <br /> Hello, Dean and Alex. <br /> I am having difficulty following the calculations and I still have concerns regarding the design. The loading is not clear <br /> and some of the framing appears undersized. Attached is a quick example calculation for one condition (apologies for <br /> the poor quality—my pens weren't cooperating). While this is a quick check and makes conservative assumptions,the <br /> framing creates an indeterminate problem,so the conservative assumptions are warranted. The result is that the <br /> framing is potentially overstressed. A more accurate analysis may show that the framing technically works. I can say <br /> this,though—2x8 framing spanning 14' at 12"spacing,while supporting both floor and roof loading, is very <br /> questionable;this is why I chose to perform a quick check of it. At this point, I'm going to let my comments rest and <br /> allow you to proceed at your discretion. However, my position remains that the structural aspects of this design should <br /> be performed and signed by a licensed engineer. <br /> Please submit final copies of the revised documents. Presuming there are no additional significant changes to the <br /> documents,we anticipate approving them. Note that the framing around the stairs,especially around the upper <br /> landing, appears to require additional framing to be shown. In addition,full-height wall stud framing should be provided <br /> on each side of the 4-foot"stair band" at the midpoint of the house;the cribbed walls on top of existing walls does not <br /> provide the proper restraint for thrust forces from the roof framing. <br /> Drew Martin, P.E.,S.E. <br /> amAssociate Engineer—Commercial Plans Examiner I Permit Services <br /> 425.257.8810 13200 Cedar Street, 2nd Floor, Everett,WA 98201 <br /> EVERETT Phone Hours: M/W/T: 8 am - 12 pm & 1 pm—3 pm;Tu: 1:OOpm-3:OOpm <br /> everettwa.gov/permits I Facebook I Twitter <br /> Note:Emails and attachments sent to and from the City of Everett are public records and may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the Public <br /> Records Act. <br /> From: Dean Dariotis<deandariotis@gmail.com> <br /> Sent:Thursday,September 8,2022 5:04 PM <br /> To: Drew Martin<dmartin@everettwa.gov>; Ryan Hammer<RHammer@everettwa.gov>;Alex Dariotis <br /> <dariotis2@gmail.com> <br /> Subject: [EXTERNAL]TUCK REMODEL B2203-034 <br /> CAUTION.This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you <br /> recognize the sender and know the content is safe. <br /> Drew&Ryan,please review the attached drawings and calculations for the Tuck job.I believe from our in <br /> person discussions this is what you are expecting to see. <br /> If you accept this information I can put on full sheets. <br /> Thanks for your review. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.