2817 MEDORA WAY 2023-12-08 - Laserfiche WebLink

Drew Martin From: Drew Martin Sent: Monday, December 6, 2021 3:41 PM To: shuchuan1112@gmail.com Subject: City of Everett Permit Services: 2817 Medora Way (132110-052) - First building Intake Review Attachments: 2018 IRC-Typical Code References_04-12-2021.docx; CoE_Residential Drawing Preparation -Edited 09-27-2021.pdf Hello, Shuchaun. Your application has been received and a permit set up. However, the submitted documents are not sufficiently developed for us to perform a comprehensive review at this time. Information is attached to provide guidance. Revised construction -level documents should be submitted for review. Two complete sets of the revised drawings should be submitted to replace the previously submitted drawing sets. Preliminary comments are provided below to assist in revising the drawings, but these are not intended to provide a comprehensive review. The resubmittal documents should include an itemized response letter clarifying how the review comments below have been addressed. Intake Review Comments: 1. The project should specify the applicable building codes, including but not limited to the 2018 IRC, 2018 WSEC, and the 2018 IBC. See Section R106.1.1 and EMC Section 16.005.030. 2. The scope of the proposed project is not clear. The documents have been provided in two or more submittals with uncoordinated and overlapping information. The drawings include color coded information that appears to include both demolition and new construction information on the existing and new plans. Annotated photographs have been submitted in lieu of clear construction details. Construction -level drawings prepared using established drafting standards are required to substantiate compliance with the IRC. The drawings should include plans, building sections, details, material specifications, design loads, architectural and structural notes, etc. as needed to clearly show the proposed work. The current editions of the building codes applicable to the project should be specified. See IRC Section R106.1.1. 3. Continuing with the previous comment, the plans appear to include undefined corrections, including but not limited to the schedule on Sheet A-5. Many of this item serve to point out deficiencies or present design -level discussion. This is not the purpose of construction drawings. The proposed work should be coordinated between the members of the design team, and construction level drawings submitted that clearly indicate the proposed work. 4. The submitted documents do not include a clear and concise set of structural plans. Significant structural modifications have been performed (e.g., roof and floor framing, modifying stair case) or are proposed (e.g., modifying exterior walls for new egress windows). Independent comprehensive structural drawings should be submitted to clarify the existing and new work. The annotations to the architectural drawings are not sufficiently clear to review. Note that overlapping and uncoordinated structural information has