My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1710 W MARINE VIEW DR Geotech Report 2023-12-29
>
Address Records
>
W MARINE VIEW DR
>
1710
>
Geotech Report
>
1710 W MARINE VIEW DR Geotech Report 2023-12-29
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/29/2023 2:40:30 PM
Creation date
12/29/2023 2:37:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W MARINE VIEW DR
Street Number
1710
Address Document Type
Geotech Report
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.2.1. Geophysical Survey <br />As shown in Figure 2, the existing test pits, SPT, and CPT borings are all located outside of the proposed <br />building footprint. Therefore, a geophysical survey was performed at the project site and also at some <br />nearby locations that overlay with some previous borings (e.g., B-1 and B-4), so that correlations between <br />the geophysical survey results and the nearby geotechnical information can be done to characterize the <br />subsurface conditions at the site, including site class and the depth of the glacially consolidated soils. <br />The geophysical survey was completed by conducting multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) along <br />five transects (Line 1 through Line 5) and one microtremor array measurements (MAM) across the project <br />site (shown as blue stars), as shown in the Geophysical Survey Arrays, Figure 3. Through the MASW, five <br />two-dimensional (2D) shear wave velocity (Vs) profiles were developed along the five transects, going down <br />to about 70 feet below ground surface (bgs); and a deeper one-dimensional (1D) Vs profile (about 300 feet <br />deep) was developed through the MAM. After calibrated with the nearby boring information (B-1 and B-4), <br />the geophysical survey indicates that the depth of the glacially consolidated soils ranges from 27.5 feet to <br />35.0 feet bgs across the building footprint. The correlations between the geophysical survey results and <br />the nearby geotechnical information are used in our geotechnical analyses completed as the basis of the <br />geotechnical recommendations. <br />The locations of the survey arrays are shown in Figure 3 and the geophysical survey report is presented in <br />Appendix B. <br />2.3. Groundwater Conditions <br />Based on the reviewed information, the design groundwater level was assumed at Elevation 0.00 feet on <br />the water side in front of the bulkhead and at Elevation +11.11 feet on the land side behind the bulkhead. <br />3.0 DESIGN CROSS SECTION <br />Cross Section AW, the location of which is shown in Figure 2, was selected for use in our geotechnical <br />analyses. The soil delineation for Cross Section AW is presented in Figure 4. Due to the lack of survey and <br />subsurface exploration information on the water side, based on our communication with the Port and PND, <br />and review of the previous engineering drawings for the nearby sites, we assumed a riprap rock slope in <br />front of the dike with a 1.5H:1V slope from Elevation +16.00 feet to Elevation +1.00 feet, and with a <br />5.5H:1V slope from Elevation +1.00 feet to Elevation -12.00 feet. The soil profile behind the dike was <br />horizontally extended to the water side. <br />4.0 EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING <br />4.1. ASCE 7-16 Seismic Design Information <br />The project site is classified as a Site Class F due to the presence of the liquefiable soils below the proposed <br />buildings. Based on our discussions with PND, it is our understanding that the building vibration period will <br />be less than 0.5 seconds. Consequently, the project can be completed usingthe code -based seismic design <br />per American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) 7-16; and a site -specific response analysis is not required. <br />GEOENGINEERS April 1. 2022 Page 3 <br />File No 0676 030-00 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.