Laserfiche WebLink
notice shall meet the requirements of Ordinance 2136-96, as <br /> amended, and shall include a statement that any affected person <br /> may request an open record public hearing. <br /> b) All public comments shall be submitted as required by Ordinance No. <br /> 2136-96, as amended. All comments received shall be in writing and <br /> shall be as specific as possible. A copy of all written comments shall be <br /> provided to the applicant. The applicant will have seven (7) days from <br /> the receipt of the comments to respond thereto. <br /> c) An open record hearing on the proposed alteration or vacation shall be <br /> held if any affected person files a written request for an open record <br /> hearing with the Planning and Community Development Department <br /> within twenty-one (21) days of the notice of application (public comment <br /> period). <br /> d) In addition to Section 3.C.1(c), within the public comment period, the <br /> Director or the City Engineer shall be authorized to request an open <br /> record hearing to be held on the proposed alteration or vacation. <br /> e) If an open record public hearing is requested by any affected person or <br /> by the City, the open record hearing shall proceed as a Review Process <br /> III as defined in Ordinance No. 2136-96, as amended. The notification <br /> for the scheduled public hearing shall be provided at least fifteen (15) <br /> days prior to the hearing and shall consist of the following: <br /> • A notice published in a newspaper of general circulation; and <br /> • Notice shall be mailed to adjacent property owners and property <br /> owners of portions affected that are within the original approved <br /> subdivision or short subdivision, and parties who have provided <br /> written comments. <br /> 0 The Director is authorized to determine whether language noted on the face of <br /> the final recorded subdivision or short subdivision plat map may constitute a <br /> condition for purposes of a revision or a restrictive covenant for purposes of an <br /> alteration. For purposes of meeting the requirements of this Ordinance and <br /> RCW 58.17.215, any restrictive covenant that has not been imposed by the City <br /> shall not be subject to the requirements of Section 3 of this Ordinance. <br /> 2. Integrated Permit Review: <br /> a) The City shall integrate the SEPA review and the review of all other <br /> requested City land use permits with review of the alteration or vacation <br /> application as defined in Ordinance No. 2136-96, as amended. <br /> b) A final SEPA threshold determination and a decision on all other <br /> administrative project permit decisions will be made concurrently with <br /> the alteration or vacation if no open record public hearing is required or <br /> requested. These decisions will be issued in the form of a Notice of <br /> Decision as provided for in Ordinance No. 2136-96, as amended. <br /> 25 <br />