Laserfiche WebLink
Note: EmaiIs and attachments sent to and from the City of Everett are public records and maybe subject to disclosure pursuant to the Public <br />Records Act. <br />From: Dean Dariotis <deandariotis@gmail.com> <br />Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 3:10 PM <br />To: Drew Martin <dmartin@everettwa.eov>; Alex Dariotis <dariotis2@gmail.com> <br />Cc: Tawnya Herman <THerman@everettwa.eov> <br />Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: B2109-076 6125 SYCAMORE PL <br />CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you <br />recognize the sender and know the content is safe. <br />I have provided complete engineering calculations with the submittal package. Do you have concerns with <br />my load tracing? Please note, as a licensed architect I have the legal authority to provide my own <br />structural calculations. <br />Thank you. <br />Dean Darlotls, President and Architect <br />Woodway Homes, Inc. <br />6306 176th St SW <br />Lynnwood, WA 98037 <br />(42 5) 772-3167 <br />deandariotis@gmail.com <br />On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 2:48 PM Drew Martin <dmartin@everettwa.eov> wrote: <br />Good afternoon, Dean. <br />I crossed out the Option 2 in order to complete the Building review. Plans should not typically include optional <br />construction, especially not significant differences in beam sizes and support conditions as shown in the plans. These <br />issues should be determined during the design, not during construction. Note that the intended redline presumes <br />that the interior support by the extra column will be provided; I didn't notice that this column was intended only for <br />Option 2. Even with the larger glulam beam, I'm not certain if it is sufficient for the design loads for a span exceeding <br />