My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5801 S 2ND AVE B 2024-11-07
>
Address Records
>
S 2ND AVE
>
5801
>
5801 S 2ND AVE B 2024-11-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/7/2024 8:41:37 AM
Creation date
5/15/2024 9:05:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
S 2ND AVE
Street Number
5801
Unit
B
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation <br />Lyashenko Accessory Dwelling Unit Development <br />Everett, Washington <br />NGA File No. 1165620 <br />April 10, 2020 <br />Page 9 <br />foundations should be poured "neat" against the native medium dense soils or compacted fill should be <br />used as backfill against the front of the footing. We recommend that the upper one foot of soil be <br />neglected when calculating the passive resistance. <br />Deep Foundations <br />Due to the presence of significant undocumented fill within the proposed development area and <br />especially along the lower northeastern edge of the site, we alternatively recommend that the new ADU <br />structure foundations could be supported on 4-inch pin piles to transfer foundation loads through the <br />upper loose soils down to the underlying native competent bearing materials, interpreted to underlie <br />the site at depth. Our explorations did not encounter any significant debris within the upper fill soils; <br />however, there is potential that debris within the fill has the possibility to impede some of the piles. <br />There should be contingencies in the budget and design for additional/relocated piles to replace piles <br />that may be obstructed by debris. We also recommend that excavation equipment be available on site <br />during pile installation so that shallow obstructions can be removed from the planned pile locations. <br />We recommend that four -inch pipe piles be utilized and should be driven using a tractor -mounted <br />hydraulic hammer, with an energy rating of at least 1,100 foot -lb. For this pile and hammer size, we <br />recommend a design capacity of eight tons for each pile driven to refusal. The refusal criterion for this <br />pile and hammer size is defined as less than one -inch of movement during 10 seconds of continuous <br />driving at a rate of 550 blows per minute or higher. We recommend using galvanized schedule 40 pipe <br />for the 4-inch pin piles. Maintaining these recommendations for minimum hammer size and refusal <br />criteria is essential for obtaining successful piles. <br />Final pile depths should be expected to vary and will depend on the depth to competent bearing soils. <br />We recommend that the piles extend a minimum of five feet into the competent native soils, in addition <br />to meeting the refusal criterion. Our explorations performed as a part of this evaluation encountered <br />competent native soils at approximately 4.0 to 7.5 feet below the existing ground surface. The piles <br />should be spaced a minimum of three feet apart to avoid a grouping effect on the piles. <br />Due to the relatively small slenderness ratio of pin piles, maintaining pin pile confinement and lateral <br />support is essential in preventing pile buckling. Pin piles should be suitably embedded into the <br />reinforced concrete. The structural engineer should design the connections of the piles to the <br />foundations. <br />NELSON GEOTECWNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.