Laserfiche WebLink
i S� <br /> kC -(AK <br /> Madison Community Church -Structural Concerns <br /> 1.) The International Building Code Legacy Report NER-405 on pages 18&22 <br /> requires the 12"wide Hardiplank to be face fastened through the Hardiplank <br /> overlap and the wall sheathing and into the steel studs @ 16"o/c. <br /> There are only 2 fasteners that NER-405 only approves for the 12"wide Hardiplank <br /> They are ET&F pins 0.100 x 1.5"x 0.25"HD(page 18)or No.8 x 1-5/8"long x <br /> 0.323"HD ribbed bugle head screws(page 22). <br /> The contractor Ryan Construction a Versapin Gripshank Pneumatic fastener <br /> manufactured by Aerosmith Fastening Systems instead of one of the 2 approved <br /> fasteners listed above. <br /> 2.) The Harristone brochure"Building Code Installation Guide"says"The guide will <br /> help you understand and comply with our Research Report approved by the <br /> ICC Building Code." <br /> "Step#1 Appropriate flashing,Step#2 Weep screen per IBC 1402.1." <br /> The GC did neither Step 1 nor Step 2. <br /> 3.) The 8"X"-bracing rods in the North/South direction were shipped to the site too <br /> short to fit in the original holes in the base of columns. The GC cut new holes <br /> through the coumn web(approximately 13"above the column base plate)and <br /> installed the rods in the new hole higher up the column. <br /> This in effect changes the structural design from a simple Concentric braced <br /> frame to an Eccentric braced frame. This field change I don't believe was <br /> ever submitted the City of Everett for approval. Also I am concerned that this <br /> detail has not as yet been stamped and signed by a Washington P.E. <br /> 4.) The GC changed the exterior non-bearing,non-shear walls to Hardiplank over <br /> OSB over steel studs @ 16"o/c. This field change I also don't believe was <br /> ever submitted to the City of Everett for approval.Also I am concerned that this <br /> detail has not as yet been stamped and signed by a Washington P.E. <br /> Also I question the adequacy of the existing connections at the top and the <br /> bottom of the exterior walls for the code required 85 mph wind loads. <br />