My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4817 RUCKER AVE 2024-12-09
>
Address Records
>
RUCKER AVE
>
4817
>
4817 RUCKER AVE 2024-12-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/9/2024 8:51:03 AM
Creation date
10/30/2024 8:27:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
RUCKER AVE
Street Number
4817
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
See Volume 5 Chapter 5 and 1-4 UIC Program for run-off treatment required for infiltration facilities. <br /> Infiltration facilities with a perforated pipe is considered a UIC well (per V1, Ch.4, S. 1-4.1) <br /> Register UIC well using Ecology's online registration process. See the following website for details: <br /> https://ecology.wa.gov/Regulations-Permits/Guidance-technical-assistance/Underground-iniection- <br /> control-program/Register-UIC-wells-online Perforated pipe removed from facility, therefore no longer <br /> a UIC <br /> Confirm if offsite areas from the south will be flowing into the site, based on the contours shown, it <br /> appears that it does. Will this flow end up in the infiltration facility? Subsequent field investigation <br /> verified no upslope contributing surface runoff from any direction. <br /> The catch basin downstream of the infiltration facility shall be provided with gas trap (prior to discharge <br /> to the sewer). Added <br /> It looks like there is an error in the two elevations listed for the infiltration facility. In the plan sheet,the <br /> inner elipse is shown at a higher elevation (303.2) than the outer elipse (296.7). This is top and bottom <br /> of the free draining rock layer and the elevations should be switched in the plan drawing. This is the <br /> opposite of what is shown in detail 1003. Corrected <br /> Plan Note 12—do not call out detail 1203 for the 12" slotted pipe. Detail does not apply for this pipe. <br /> Provide section view of infiltration facility(detail 1209 missing). Corrected and added <br /> Detail 1003: Extend free draining rock layer to at least 6-inches above the slotted PVC pipe. Done <br /> Line sides of infiltration facility with permeable filter fabric, See V5, Ch 5, BMP-T7.20 Done <br /> Provide Detail 1209 for the Section view of the infiltration facility,for review. Added <br /> Stormwater Management Report: <br /> SWPPP/TESC plan- Protect infiltration facility from sediment runoff generated during construction. See <br /> section II-7.0 of the Geotechnical Engineering Report. Added interceptor Swale to divert flows away <br /> from facility during construction and note on plan to not connect inlet pipe into facility until site is <br /> stabilized. <br /> MR#5 isn't required under the new stormwater ordinance for the combined sewer area. Removed <br /> MR6:Artificial turf is considered by Ecology to be a pollution generating surface (see PGPS definition pg <br /> 1073, Ecology manual). Treatment is required for the storm flows from the rubber playground surface <br /> that discharge to the infiltration facility. Treatment is not required for flows that discharge to the <br /> combined sewer system. Treatment requirements will be dependent on what type of material is used <br /> for the playground surfacing. Please provide this information per my previous email. See earlier <br /> response <br /> MR 7:The project is in the combined sewer area and adds over 200 sf of net new impervious area. The <br /> City's Ordinance related to Stormwater Controls in the Combined Sewer Area applies. See Section 6.10 <br /> of the DCSS. <br /> Per section 6.10 of the DCSS,flow control will be required and shall comply with the following standard: <br /> • Storm water discharges shall match developed discharge durations to existing site durations for <br /> the range of existing discharge rates from the 10-year peak flow through the full 100-year peak <br /> flow. (note that this requirement is different than what was modeled for this project) Update <br /> drainage calculation section for these thresholds. WWHM updated <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.