Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> • <br /> Mr. Justin Simpson <br /> Fluke'Corporation. <br /> November 15,2021 <br /> Page 2 <br /> enclosed in accordance with IBC Section 1019.3. The travel distance associated with the exit <br /> access stairways is existing and remains unchanged. Based on a general review of the <br /> furniture layout plans for eats floor, no B occupancy areas exceed 300 travel distance to the <br /> First Floor exits or Second Floor exits to outdoor elevated walkways that lead to the adjacent <br /> parking lot Additionally, no F-1 occupancy areas (found on Level 1) exceed 250' travel <br /> distance to an exit on the First Floor. <br /> Coffman surveyed the location of the existing doors on electromagnetic door hold open devices <br /> (see Appendix A). It does not appear that the current construction of the walls is rated or is <br /> required to be fire rated. Most of the existing frames and doors are not rated. Additionally, the <br /> walls do not continue through the suspended ceiling to deck. Horizontally, the walls do not <br /> continue in a manner that provides a complete fire separation from adjacent spaces. The walls <br /> are constructed as normal,unrated partitions and as a result, it does not appear that providing <br /> doors on electromagnetic door hold open devices that release upon fire alarm activation are <br /> required based upon the use of the space. Coffman's opinion is the electromagnetic door hold <br /> open devices may be demolished. <br /> Please clt if you have any questions. <br /> • Sincerely, <br /> COFFMAN ENGINEERS, INC, <br /> 0,0a111".. <br /> \ E <br /> t <br /> k /it <br /> v• •Jr, IP <br /> ar, <br /> .46ittv- <br /> es <br /> livarvilootit <br /> Dave Granilich, P.E. <br /> Senior Discipline Fire Protection Engineer <br /> dg:rzd <br /> P:1Sea12/Jobs12/0619 Fluke-PCA15.0 PROJECT DEVELOPMENTAFite Door Sthvey1Fluke Fire Door Review(R1).doe <br /> 3itp www.coffman.com <br />