Laserfiche WebLink
Confidential Draft Hydrogen Fueling Station Performance Validation Testing—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE <br /> HyStEP Summary Test Report for Linde—Mobile Refueler Hydrogen Station Updated Revision Date:September 29,2023 <br /> I. Executive Summary <br /> The following is a summary of the tests performed at the Linde mobile refueler hydrogen station, which <br /> includes the following observations, conditions, limitations, and/ or necessary changes. <br /> 1. The Linde station/dispenser is designed as a mobile refueler module that can also be categorized as a <br /> stationary station module, that can be utilized temporary or permanently, depending on the need and <br /> application. It is designed and intended for ambient temperature (without pre-cooling) hydrogen fueling <br /> of heavy-duty vehicles, e.g., vehicles that use a CHSS volume significantly greater than 248.6 L. <br /> 2. Station module has one Bennett dispenser with H35 and H70 nozzles, which is connected to a mobile hydrogen <br /> fueling/supply storage system (vessels) of 500 bar(50 MPa). H70 nozzle was not working and has not been fully <br /> validated and/or ready to be used by Bennett. For this testing report, ONLY H35 has been validated by HyStEP. <br /> 3. For this testing performed using HyStEP, the dispenser implemented the general fault and table-based <br /> communication requirements from the current SAE J2601-2020 Table-Based fueling protocol but used ambient <br /> fueling table D-35 from SAE (TIR)J2601-2010 and the fueling protocol function requirements that are unique to <br /> ambient fueling. The dispenser was tested using the latest ANSI/CSA HGV 4.3-2022 testing method for the <br /> general fault and communications testing, and some additional tests were created for ambient fueling <br /> temperature tolerances. <br /> 4. Linde plans to use the Clean Energy Partnership fueling tables for fueling heavy duty sized CHSS. <br /> 5. Station is designed and intended to fill ONLY heavy-duty vehicles with a CHSS volume greater than 248.6L. <br /> Due to CHSS size limitations on HyStEP, fueling tests were conducted using CHSS Categories B and C. <br /> 6. Station has not implemented Top-off and Cold Dispensing (CD)fueling protocols. Top-off fueling protocol and <br /> cold dispensing are not required in J2601-2010. <br /> 7. Initial pressure (Pinitial) is determined after the connection pulse during the initial leak check. The dispenser does <br /> not use the vehicle MP signal to determine initial pressure. <br /> Bennett comment: before the start of a fill, the station measures the initial pressure in the CHSS immediately <br /> after the connection pulse according to J2601 (2020) Section 3.11.3 and J2601 (2010 preliminary) Section <br /> 7.1.2.1. Additionally, J2601 (2020) Section 8.3.1 states that a communicated pressure below 0.5 MPa is <br /> acceptable if the pressure measured after the connection pulse exceeds 0.5 MPa. Therefore, the test setup for <br /> test 2b was invalid and CARB correctly indicated in the Final Result column that the test was N/A. <br /> CARB comment: We included test 2b to determine whether the dispenser responds to an MP signal below the <br /> minimum initial pressure (2 MPa in this case). We agree that it is not a required test and the correct result is N/A. <br /> 8. The following fault tests were conducted using actual fueling by modifying the measured station pressure, fuel <br /> delivery temperature, or ambient temperature inputs in the PLC. See more details in the General Fault testing <br /> section: <br /> a. Ambient temperature signal. <br /> b. Minimum fuel delivery temperature. <br /> c. Ambient temperature limits for ambient fueling. <br /> d. Fuel delivery temperature tolerance for ambient fueling. <br /> e. Upper pressure corridor limit. <br /> 3 <br /> Page 12 of 38 <br />