My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7000 HARDESON RD 2024-12-30
>
Address Records
>
HARDESON RD
>
7000
>
7000 HARDESON RD 2024-12-30
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2024 9:21:59 AM
Creation date
12/3/2024 8:15:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
HARDESON RD
Street Number
7000
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Confidential Draft Hydrogen Fueling Station Performance Validation Testing—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE <br /> HyStEP Summary Test Report for Linde—Mobile Refueler Hydrogen Station Updated Revision Date:September 29,2023 <br /> 9. Station uses total mass average temperature measurement method to monitor the fuel delivery temperature <br /> during the entire fueling process. <br /> 10. Station is designed not to fuel vehicles if the communicated receptacle type (RT) other than H35, e.g., H70. <br /> HyStEP operator permanently changed RT from H70 (default) to H35 in the IrDA to resume testing. <br /> 11. Station does not fuel vehicles in non-communication mode. However, for a fill that begins with communication and <br /> then communication is lost, station uses the non-communication ending pressure table for the associated tank <br /> volume, based on the volume that was determined when communication was valid at the start of the fill. <br /> Bennett comment: when a fill begins with communication and then communication is lost, J2601 (2010 <br /> preliminary) does not give guidance, however, J2601 (2020) Section 8.9.3 does, stating that the station shall <br /> determine a new non-communication target pressure based upon a new initial pressure determination. During <br /> testing, the original initial pressure and latest ambient temperature was used for the non-communication target <br /> pressure. The station logic will be changed so that the latest MP received when communications were lost <br /> will be used to compute the non-communications target pressure. Since the non-communications target <br /> pressure also depends on the ambient temperature, the latest ambient temperature reading will also be <br /> used to establish the non-communications target pressure when communication is lost. <br /> CARB comment: The updated logic will satisfy the requirements of J2601-2020, we are satisfied. <br /> 4-2L. In communication mode, dispenser does not fuel vehicles if the CHSS initial pressure (PO) is less than 2.0 MPa. <br /> Dispenser does not monitor and respond to the measured pressure (MP) prior to the initial connection pulse. <br /> fueling.However, the dispenser GOrnpletes the GenneGtien pulse before terminating The dispenser measures the <br /> initial pressure during the initial leak check as described in J2601-2020. <br /> Bennett comment: see response to item 7.; According to J2601 (2020) Section 8.3.1, measured pressure (MP) <br /> below the minimum initial pressure is acceptable if the connection pulse measurement is above the minimum <br /> initial pressure. <br /> CARB comment: we agree with your assessment and do not have an issue with your implementation of initial <br /> pressure measurement. <br /> Overall Results Summary <br /> General Fault and Communications Tests <br /> • Majority of tests passed—except: <br /> o Test 11 — Lower Pressure Corridor Limit— It is unclear to CARB staff whether the lower pressure <br /> corridor limit is being enforced correctly. We were unable to run this as an individual test (time <br /> constraints), but during other tests the dispenser pressure dropped below the lower corridor for>15 <br /> seconds without terminating the fill. See tests 20 and 21. The dispenser data does not indicate any <br /> intended non-fueling time during these fills, although pauses in flow did occur. For the Table Based <br /> protocol, dispenser should pause the APRR corridor ramp during intended non-fueling time, which <br /> may have allowed these fills to not violate the lower corridor limit, but Bennett's own fueling graphs <br /> do not show APRR corridor pauses. <br /> Bennett comment: (Test 11, Test 20) Lower Pressure Corridor Limit. The station was not <br /> checking the lower pressure corridor limit when the mass flow was 0. When mass flow returned, <br /> the pressure was restored above the lower corridor limit in less than 15 seconds. The station <br /> logic will be revised to always check the lower corridor limit while fueling is intended. <br /> 4 <br /> Page 13 of 38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.