Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Fulton Street Pedestrian Bicycle Corridor PAGE 92 OF 114 CONTRACT <br />FEDERAL AID # TAP-0420(026) <br />WO #3785 September 6, 2024 <br /> <br />For each compaction lot with one or two sublots, having all sublots attain a relative 1 <br />density that is 91 percent of the reference maximum density the HMA shall be accepted 2 <br />at the unit Contract price with no further evaluation. When a sublot does not attain a 3 <br />relative density that is 91 percent of the reference maximum density, the lot shall be 4 <br />evaluated in accordance with Section 1 -06.2 to determine the appropriate CPF. The 5 <br />maximum CPF shall be 1.00, however, lots with a calculated CPF in excess of 1.00 will 6 <br />be used to offset lots with CPF values below 1.00 but greater than 0.90. Lots with CPF 7 <br />lower than 0.90 will be evaluated for compliance per 5 -04.3(11). Additional testing by 8 <br />either a nuclear moisture-density gauge or cores will be completed as required to provide 9 <br />a minimum of three tests for evaluation. 10 <br /> 11 <br />For compaction below the required 91% a Non -Conforming Compaction Factor (NCCF) 12 <br />will be determined. The NCCF equals the algebraic difference of CPF minus 1.00 13 <br />multiplied by 40 percent. The Compaction Price Adjustment will be calculated as the 14 <br />product of CPF, the quantity of HMA in the compaction control lot in tons, and the unit 15 <br />Contract price per ton of mix. 16 <br /> 17 <br />5-04.3(11) Reject Work 18 <br /> 19 <br />5-04.3(11)A Reject Work General 20 <br />Work that is defective or does not conform to Contract requirements shall be rejected. 21 <br />The Contractor may propose, in writing, alternatives to removal and replacement of 22 <br />rejected material. Acceptability of such alternative proposals will be determined at the 23 <br />sole discretion of the Engineer. HMA that has been rejected is subject to the 24 <br />requirements in Section 1-06.2(2) and this specification, and the Contractor shall submit 25 <br />a corrective action proposal to the Engineer for approval. 26 <br /> 27 <br />5-04.3(11)B Rejection by Contractor 28 <br />The Contractor may, prior to sampling, elect to remove any defective material and 29 <br />replace it with new material. Any such new material will be sampled, tested, and 30 <br />evaluated for acceptance. 31 <br /> 32 <br />5-04.3(11)C Rejection Without Testing (Mixture or Compaction) 33 <br />The Engineer may, without sampling, reject any batch, load, or section of Roadway that 34 <br />appears defective. Material rejected before placement shall not be incorporated into the 35 <br />pavement. Any rejected section of Roadway shall be removed. 36 <br /> 37 <br />No payment will be made for the rejected materials or the removal of the materials 38 <br />unless the Contractor requests that the rejected material be tested. If the Contractor 39 <br />elects to have the rejected material tested, a minimum of three representative samples 40 <br />will be obtained and tested. Acceptance of rejected material will be based on 41 <br />conformance with the nonstatistical acceptance Specification. If the CPF for the rejected 42 <br />material is less than 0.75, no payment will be made for the rejected material; in addition, 43 <br />the cost of sampling and testing shall be borne by the Contractor. If the CPF is greater 44 <br />than or equal to 0.75, the cost of sampling and testing will be borne by the Contracting 45 <br />Agency. If the material is rejected before placement and the CPF is greater than or equal 46 <br />to 0.75, compensation for the rejected material will be at a CPF of 0.75. If rejection 47 <br />occurs after placement and the CPF is greater than or equal to 0.75, compensation for 48