3405 ROCKEFELLER AVE B 2025-04-17

• • NTHWOODWAY HOMES, INC. WECEOVE-N1 Gen.Cont.Lie.#WOODWHI942NC 6306 176th St SW FEB 1 Lynnwood,WA 98037 .- 6 2023 j2/ CITY OF EVERETT 6/20/2022 Permit Services Plan Check Number: B2107-075 First Building Review 3405 Rockefeller Avenue Owner: 3405 Rockefeller,LLC General 1. The submittal only included one set of construction drawings. Two sets should be submitted. TWO SETS OF DRAWINGS ARE PRESENTED. 2. The project should specify the applicable building codes, including but not limited to the 2018 IRC, 2018 WSEC, and the 2018 IBC. See Section R106.1.1 and EMC Section 16.005.030. APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES HAVE BEEN NOTED ON SHT GC-1.0, FIRST PARAGRAPH. 3. The extent of existing and proposed work is not clear. For example, some of the 2x6 collar ties appear to be new framing, while others appear to be existing but are not labeled accordingly. The use of additional existing labels, as well as standard drafting conventions (e.g., grey-scale lines for existing work, etc.) is recommended. See Section R106.1.1. BLDG. B, (BACK BUILDING) HAS MODIFIED FRAMING. WE ATTEMPT TO INDICATE ORIGINAL, EXISTING AND NEW WORK. ADDITIONAL DETAIL CAN BE PROVIDED FOR ANY QUESTIONABLE WORK. 4. The First Floor Plan on Sheet S1 includes a 38.5-inch exterior door that does not appear to be part of the original 1910 construction. Note that the original egress appears to have been the porch on the east side of the building. It is understood that the door does not have a legally permitted exterior landing, and that the elevation drop to an exterior existing slab-on-grade is approximately 1 foot. Documentation should be submitted confirming that the doorway is part of the original construction. Alternatively, reframing of the wall to construction the new doorway should be specified in the drawings. See Sections R102.7.1, R106.1.1, and R301.1. EGRESS DOOR IS NOW INDICATED ON WEST ELEVATION OF BLDG. B. LEGAL LANDING AND STEPS ARE SHOWN AND ARE CONSTRUCTED. DOOR IS 36"STANDARD DOOR, AS REQUIRED FOR ENTRY. 5. The project includes reconstruction of the stairway. The stairway location is stated as occurring in the same place as the existing stairway. However, it is understood that the existing stairway is being replaced because it is also not the original 1910 construction. In addition, the existing stairway was not reconstructed with permits and does not comply with the requirements of Section R311.7.5. Note also that the top of the stairway has a minimum head clearance of approximately 5 feet per Section B/S2, indicating that the existing stairway may have been relocated from the location of the original stairway (e.g., the upper portion may have turned east-west to maintain headroom, etc.). Alex Dariotis,CPM WOODWAY HOMES,INC. Dean Dariotis,AIA PHONE 425-773-4356 PHONE 425 772-3167 1I9