3405 ROCKEFELLER AVE A, B, C 2025-04-17

Drew Martin From: Drew Martin Sent: Monday, October 24, 2022 5:21 PM To: 'Alex Dariotis' Cc: 'Dean Dariotis' Subject: RE: City of Everett Permit Services: 3405 Rockefeller Avenue (B2209-033) - First Building Intake Review Hello,Alex and Dean. This email recaps our conversation and will serve as the intake review letter. Your application has been received and a permit set up. However, the submitted documents are not sufficiently developed for us to perform a comprehensive review at this time. Revised construction-level documents should be submitted for review. Two complete sets of the revised drawings should be submitted to replace the previously submitted drawing sets. Preliminary comments are provided below to assist in revising the drawings, but these are not intended to provide a comprehensive review. The resubmittal documents should include an itemized response letter clarifying how the review comments below have been addressed. Intake Review Comments: 1. The drawings reference the IRC. The project is a commercial building and should only conform to the IBC. 2. The notes should reference the residential provision of the WSEC. 3. The drawings should specify the construction type for the building. It is presumed the type is VB. 4. The drawings should specify the occupancy classification of the building. The classification should be R- 2. 5. The overall scope of the project is not clear. Based on telephone correspondence, it is understood that the wall covering throughout the entire house have been stripped. It is also understood that additional work has occurred, including but not limited to replacing more or all of the plumbing fixtures. The submitted drawings do not indicate this and show very limited work occurring, including almost nothing at the upper level. The drawings should be revised to clearly show all work. 6. Continuing with the previous comment, the drawings typically do not distinguish between existing and new construction using conventional drafting standards (e.g., light vs heavy line weights, etc., cross- hatching, etc.). The drawings also do not provide details to clarify wall and floor assemblies. The drawings should be revised to clearly indicate all required work. 7. The framing plan included in the drawings appears to show more work than is occurring, such as adding new beams, and do not include some work that is occurring, such as infill framing of the main floor at the demolished chimney. Details are also not included for the infill of the roof at the demolished chimney. The drawings should be revised to clearly show the proposed structural work. New work should be distinguished from existing using established drafting standards. 8. Additional details are required to show all of the required vertical and horizontal fire-rated assemblies. Note that the main floor framing is required to rated at some locations, including but not limited to the eastern 1/3 and the overall in the upper and lower units at the west end. All fire-rated assemblies is required to be supported by fire-rated assemblies. Addition interior walls and beams 1