3332 COLBY AVE CALVARY BAPTIST CHURCH 2025-06-09

Mr. Martin Reimers Concept Architecture, LLC Plan Check Number: B2210-002, First Building Review January 20, 2023 Gravity System: 5. The framing plans on Sheet S101 do not clearly indicate the required construction. Framing is not specified in multiple locations as indicated in the sections and details. The plans indicate both wood and steel posts, but do not clearly indicate the which is intended at each location. The continuity of posts between the basement, main level, and upper roof is not clear. The extent of continuous beam lengths is not indicated; the north end of the roof includes a cantilever end that should be supported by a backspan with a minimum defined length. The size and spacing of the roof joists is not specified. The framing plans should be revised. See IBC Sections 107.2.1, 1603.1, and 1604.4. 6. The details in the structural drawings do not appear to provide complete connections between the structural framing elements, including but not limited to roof joists and beam, beam-beam connections, and beam-post connections. Connection details should be included in the drawings. See IBC Sections 107.2.1 and 1603.1. Lateral System: 7. The lateral load paths for the new entryway structure are not clear. Structural calculations for lateral resistance have not been provided. The connections to the existing URM in the details on Sheets S800 and S801 do not substantiate a valid load path. Regarding out-of-plane loading, a direction connection to structural framing under the URM veneer is required, or analysis and additional detailing is required to substantiating the wall construction and its capacity to transfer lateral forces from its own weight and the additional roof weight. See IBC Sections 1604.1, 1604.2, 1604.4, and 1613.1. 8. Continuing with previous comments, the details in the structural drawings do not appear to include connections between the structural walls and foundations and should be revised. Calculations substantiating the anchor capacities should be submitted for review. See IBC Sections 107.2.1 and 1604.4. 9. Calculations for shear wall holdowns should be submitted for review. The design should comply with one of the methods per ACI 318-14 Section 17.2.3.4.3. Where Option (d) is used, the overstrength factor must be applied to the earthquake component, not the net uplift force. See IBC Sections 1605.2 and 1613.1, and ASCE 7-16 Section 12.4.3.1. 10. Calculations for shear wall shear anchors should be submitted for review. The design should comply with one of the methods per ACI 318-14 Section 17.2.3.5.3. Where Option (c) is used, the overstrength factor must be applied to the earthquake component, not the net uplift force. See IBC Sections 1605.2 and 1613.1, and ASCE 7-16 Section 12.4.3.1. 3200 Cedar Street © 425.257.8810 O everetteps@everettwa.gov Everett,WA 98201 425.257.8857 fax everettwa.gov/permits Page 4 of 5