Laserfiche WebLink
Geotechnical Engineering Report <br /> Proposed Flight Line Steam Line Project lierracon <br /> Boeing Everett Facility • Everett, Washington <br /> January 17, 2012 • Terracon Project No.: 81115085 <br /> 111 4.2 Earthwork <br /> The following sections present recommendations for earthwork on the project. The <br /> recommendations presented in this report for design and construction of the utilidor are <br /> contingent upon following the recommendations outlined in this section. Earthwork on the <br /> project should be observed and evaluated by Terracon. Evaluation of earthwork should include <br /> observation and testing of engineered fill, subgrade preparation, foundation bearing soils, and <br /> other geotechnical conditions exposed during the construction of the project. <br /> ' 4.2.1 Site Preparation <br /> Preparation for construction should begin with procedures intended to control surface water <br /> runoff. It will be difficult to maintain temporary cuts, protect subgrade soils, and successfully <br /> utilize on-site soils as "engineered fill" if drainage is not controlled during construction. <br /> Concentrated runoff should not be allowed to enter excavations. Sand bags and asphalt berms <br /> are some methods that could be considered to divert surface water away from excavations <br /> given the paved nature of the surrounding area. <br /> 4.2.2 Excavation <br /> We expect that conventional trackhoes and excavators will be able to excavate the soils along <br /> the utilidor alignments. It may be necessary to rip dense to very dense glacial till soil in portions <br /> of the alignment to facilitate excavation. Cobbles and boulders may be encountered in the <br /> glacial till deposits due to the depositional environments associated with this soil type. The <br /> contractor should be prepared to deal with cobbles and boulders. <br /> 4.2.3 Temporary Slopes <br /> The stability of temporary cut slopes made during site work is a function of many factors, <br /> including, but not limited to, the following considerations: <br /> ■ the presence and abundance of groundwater; <br /> • the type and density of the various soil strata; <br /> I . the depth of the cut; <br /> • surcharge loadings adjacent to the excavations; and <br /> I . the length of time the excavation remains open. <br /> 1 Consequently, it is exceedingly difficult to establish a safe and maintenance-free cut slope angle <br /> in advance of construction. Cut slope stability should, therefore, be the responsibility of the <br /> contractor, since the contractor is continuously at the job site, able to observe the nature and <br /> condition of the subsurface materials encountered, monitor the cut performance, and control the <br /> scheduling of site activities. <br /> 111 I <br /> Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 5 <br />